Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Anthropic sued by music publishers over Claude training

The complaint alleges the works were obtained through torrenting, scraping, and downloads.

Anthropic sued by music publishers over Claude training

Some of the biggest names in the music industry have filed a massive lawsuit against Anthropic, claiming the company engaged in a flagrant and widespread theft of copyrighted music. This legal action marks the beginning of what is expected to be a lengthy battle over intellectual property rights in the age of artificial intelligence.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in northern California, names Anthropic, its CEO Dario Amodei, and co-founder Benjamin Mann as defendants. Units of Sony Music and Warner Music are among the plaintiffs in the 48-page complaint.

According to the plaintiffs, Anthropic has been involved in a "brazen campaign of illegally torrenting, scraping, and downloading copyrighted works on a massive scale" to develop and operate its Claude series of AI models. The complaint specifically alleges that the company pirated thousands of musical works, demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages for each infringed piece.

This is not the first time Anthropic has faced accusations of piracy for training its models. In September 2025, the company settled the largest copyright dispute in U.S. history, agreeing to pay $1.5 billion to authors and publishers. However, the music industry is known for its aggressive legal actions concerning copyright infringement, as evidenced by the company's agreement in the wake of the Napster and LimeWire controversies of the past.

Anthropic has not yet responded to the lawsuit.

Written by urgent.news from Axios's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at techinasia.com →

More in AI

Five bugs in my LLM app that never threw an error

I spent two and a half weeks building an agent that reads a project's code review history and remembers what it decided. 86,321 comments from pandas, distilled into 298 conventions, served out of…

  • Agent refused to act due to boolean condition misunderstanding
  • System discarded responses when maintainer commented without reason
  • 68 path rules stored as non-matching due to wildcard mismatch

Why the AI character would not calm down, and how I fixed it

An early version of Say It Ahead had a basic problem. A user could listen carefully, ask good questions, and offer a reasonable plan, but the AI character might still sound just as upset as it did at…

  • AI character lacked adaptability, remaining in initial state of distress
  • Four roles (acknowledge, question, reflect, agree) replaced magic words
  • Live progress display linked character behavior to visible interface

More from Sunday 30 August →