Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

AI boom hits a political wall as US voters rage over data centre costs

BRAZORIA (Texas), Aug 30 — The data centres powering America’s artificial intelligence boom have become an u...

AI boom hits a political wall as US voters rage over data centre costs

The growth of artificial intelligence in the United States has hit a snag as voters express frustration over the soaring costs of data centers. In the 2022 midterm elections, the issue has become a political liability for Democrats and an increasing number of Republicans. At least 21 races in 18 states have included advertisements related to data centers, with both parties showing equal interest in the issue.

In Ohio's Senate race, the cost of data centers drove up capacity costs by $9.3 billion, a 174% increase, according to an independent market monitor. Reacting to higher electricity bills and noise, politicians who were previously wooed by the data centers are now turning against them. Texas Governor Greg Abbott froze new projects, while his Democratic challenger proposed a moratorium until stronger safeguards were in place.

In Brazoria, Texas, Melissa Burnett, a resident, complained about the disruptive 17-megawatt data center that intruded into her quiet neighborhood. Trump, a Republican, has not moved and still considers the industry crucial for defeating China in the AI race. However, some Democrats, like New York's governor, have imposed a year-long moratorium on new hyperscale facilities, requiring developers to cover infrastructure costs and meet tougher standards.

Written by urgent.news from Malay Mail's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at malaymail.com →

More in AI

LLM Observability: Tracing, Logging, Debugging Agent Runs

Why your LLM app will fail silently, and how to see it before your customers do. Three weeks. That is how long a customer-support agent shipped confidently wrong answers for a logistics client I work…

  • LLMs are nondeterministic, producing different outputs for the same prompt.
  • Hidden state (prompt, retrieved chunks, model versions) influences LLM outcomes.
  • Tracing, logging, and evaluations are recommended for LLM observability.

Five bugs in my LLM app that never threw an error

I spent two and a half weeks building an agent that reads a project's code review history and remembers what it decided. 86,321 comments from pandas, distilled into 298 conventions, served out of…

  • Agent refused to act due to boolean condition misunderstanding
  • System discarded responses when maintainer commented without reason
  • 68 path rules stored as non-matching due to wildcard mismatch

More from Sunday 30 August →