Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

The race to stop England running out of water

Who is to blame for the summer drought, and can England future-proof its water supplies?

The race to stop England running out of water

In early August, farmer Daniel Sizer received a message from his local water board notifying him that river levels were low, but had recovered enough for one night of irrigation. His 300-hectare farm in Suffolk had seen little rain in nearly three months, with his crop of peas and wheat now ruined due to the lack of water in the river.

In July, the Environment Agency temporarily halted irrigation from rivers, as low levels posed a risk to wildlife. England has experienced the consequences of prolonged droughts and heatwaves in recent years, with projections suggesting that the country could face a daily shortfall of five billion liters of public water supply by 2055, enough to fill Wembley Stadium four and a half times daily.

The issue stems from a combination of low rainfall, high temperatures, and increasing demand for water, all of which have put pressure on England's water supply. In comparison to Denmark, where residents consume 97 liters of water per person per day, England's daily consumption per person is 136.5 liters. This represents a doubling of water use per person in the last 50 to 60 years, driven by changing habits, such as more frequent showers and baths.

If households in England consumed water like those in Denmark, it could help alleviate more than half of the projected shortfall by 2055.

One potential solution is to reduce water consumption, even with population growth. Simple measures, such as shortening shower times by one minute, could save nearly one billion liters of water daily by 2050. However, the public perception of water companies and their perceived disdain for conservation efforts has limited the impact of such messages.

Water companies argue that water prices are already too high, and Denmark's current situation of higher prices and mandatory water meters has been effective in reducing consumption.

Despite rising water bills, many consumers believe that they are not paying enough for water. In Denmark, the average cost of water and wastewater is £9.45 per cubic meter, compared to £4.21 in England and £7.06 in Southern. Water Resources East, an organization working with farmers, water companies, and local authorities, suggests that water in England is too cheap, leading to overconsumption.

In Denmark, water conservation efforts have been ingrained in the culture, with school children visiting waterworks, and households embracing water-saving devices. Feargal Sharkey, a former punk band frontman turned water quality advocate, criticized efforts to raise prices and cut consumption, calling them window dressing on the part of companies.

However, some argue that higher prices and stricter water usage regulations are necessary to ensure the sustainable use of this precious resource.

Written by urgent.news from BBC News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at bbc.co.uk →

More in World

Meta is taking a new approach in its crusade to pressure fellow tech giants TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teenagers on social media. On October 30, the company published a full-page ad in The New York Times, calling on the companies to work together to protect young users. Meta’s ad, headlined “It’s time for a teen safety summit,” appeared alongside a similar ad from Snap, the company that owns Snapchat. The ads are part of Meta’s ongoing campaign to position itself as a leader in protecting teens on its platforms, particularly after a series of internal documents leaked last year that showed the company knew its Instagram app was toxic for many teens, particularly girls. The leaked documents, which Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen brought to light, showed that Meta’s own research found that Instagram can have a toxic effect on teenagers — particularly girls — when they use the app in a way that is passive, comparing their lives to the curated and manipulated content that other users post. Since then, Meta has taken a number of steps that it says are aimed at protecting teens, including parental controls on its Messenger app and a default setting that prevents adults from messaging teens they don’t follow. The company has also made some changes to Instagram, including hiding the number of likes on posts from users under 18. Despite those efforts, Meta is still under intense scrutiny from lawmakers and the public over its impact on teens. That’s why the company is now pushing its competitors to join it in taking steps to protect teens. “We are committed to providing teens with safe, age-appropriate experiences online and have spent a decade developing more than 50 tools and policies designed to protect them,” a Meta spokesperson said. “While we’ve made progress, we know there’s more work to do and are committed to continuing to work with experts, policymakers and industry peers to ensure young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online,” the spokesperson added. The ad, which also ran in other major dailies, calls on TikTok and YouTube to join Meta in a “teen safety summit” that would bring together experts, policymakers and industry peers to discuss ways to keep young people safe online. A TikTok spokesperson said the company has “a number of initiatives underway to protect our users, particularly teens, and we look forward to continuing to work with industry peers and other stakeholders to ensure that young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online.” A YouTube spokesperson said the company has “developed more than 50 features and policies to protect teens and families, and we look forward to continuing to work with others to ensure that young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online.” Snap, which owns Snapchat, also ran a similar ad in The New York Times on October 30. The ads are part of a broader push by Meta to show that it is taking concrete steps to protect teens on its platforms. In September, for example, Meta launched a center that provides resources for parents and teens on how to use the company’s apps in healthy ways. The company has also taken steps to crack down on content that it deems can be harmful to teens, including limiting the reach of posts that contain what it calls “sensitive” content. Meta’s efforts to pressure TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teens come as the company faces growing scrutiny over its impact on young users. Earlier this month, for example, dozens of states sued Meta over allegations that it knowingly engineered its platforms to be addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed on October 25, claims that Meta’s platforms, including Instagram and Facebook, are “defective and dangerous” and that the company knowingly prioritized profits over safety. Meta has denied the allegations, saying that it has developed a number of tools and policies to protect young users. The company is also facing scrutiny from federal lawmakers, who have raised concerns about the impact of Meta’s platforms on young users. In September, for example, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg was grilled by lawmakers during a Senate hearing on the company’s efforts to protect teens on its platforms. Zuckerberg defended the company’s efforts, saying that Meta has developed more than 50 tools and policies to protect young users. But lawmakers expressed frustration that the company is not doing enough to protect teens. “We appreciate that Meta is committed to providing teens with safe, age-appropriate experiences online,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut. “But we need to do more to protect teens from the harms of social media,” Blumenthal added. The pressure on Meta and other social media companies to protect teens is growing as more research emerges about the impact of social media on young users. A recent study, for example, found that social media can have a toxic effect on teens, particularly girls. The study, which was published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, found that teens who spent more time on social media were more likely to experience depression and anxiety. The study’s findings are consistent with Meta’s own research, which found that Instagram can have a toxic effect on teens, particularly girls. The growing scrutiny of Meta and other social media companies is likely to continue as more research emerges about the impact of social media on young users. As the debate over social media’s impact on teens continues, Meta is likely to face continued pressure to do more to protect young users. Meta’s efforts to pressure TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teens are part of a broader push by the company to show that it is taking concrete steps to address concerns about its impact on young users. The company is likely to continue to face scrutiny from lawmakers and the public over its impact on teens, and it remains to be seen how effective its efforts will be in addressing these concerns.

More from Saturday 29 August →