Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Saturday, 29 August 2026 Reading Room

Tech

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott orders state agencies to pause funding for Flock cameras; an investigation found an agency allocating $30M+ to build Texas' Flock network (Ayden Runnels/The Texas Tribune)

The order came as The Texas Tribune was preparing to publish an investigation detailing how a state agency has devoted …

texastribune.org ·

Florida and Texas are taking steps to terminate their association with Flock, a surveillance company grappling with privacy concerns and misappropriation of its tracking technology. Florida’s Department of Transportation announced on Monday its intention to discontinue the use of license plate readers, including Flock’s cameras, statewide, citing "serious reports of misuse, data privacy concerns, and surveillance practices."

The state has a 30-day window to remove the cameras. The decision follows Governor Ron DeSantis's recent characterization of the technology as "out of control" in a press conference. Texas has joined Florida in this action, ordering state agencies to cease funding Flock cameras. Governor Greg Abbott's office cited the abuse of the surveillance system, including a recent indictment of a Lufkin, Texas police officer with 100 felony counts for allegedly searching Flock’s database to track individuals without authorization.

Abbott's office did not specify which agencies would be impacted, but reports suggest Dallas could be significantly affected, as there are reportedly hundreds of Flock cameras operating within the city. The move aligns with growing bipartisan apprehensions over privacy and civil liberties, stemming from reports of cybersecurity issues, police using their access to Flock’s database to stalk ex-partners, and accuracy problems that have led to wrongful arrests and police stops.

Recent reporting indicates that Flock cameras are transitioning from license plate scanning to identifying and tracking individuals. Flock currently operates approximately 130,000 license plate readers across the United States. The company has faced backlash from communities whose residents oppose the presence of Flock cameras in their neighborhoods.

Notably, towns such as Evanston, Ill., Cambridge, Mass., and Eugene, Ore., have reinstated or reactivated their cameras despite terminating their contracts with Flock. TechCrunch reached out to Flock to inquire if the company plans to permit Florida and Texas to remove their cameras or if Flock intends to reinstall or reactivate them. A spokesperson from Flock did not respond to the inquiry.

Written by urgent.news from TechCrunch's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 4 other outlets

Read the original at texastribune.org →

More in Tech

Meta is taking a new approach in its crusade to pressure fellow tech giants TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teenagers on social media. On October 30, the company published a full-page ad in The New York Times, calling on the companies to work together to protect young users. Meta’s ad, headlined “It’s time for a teen safety summit,” appeared alongside a similar ad from Snap, the company that owns Snapchat. The ads are part of Meta’s ongoing campaign to position itself as a leader in protecting teens on its platforms, particularly after a series of internal documents leaked last year that showed the company knew its Instagram app was toxic for many teens, particularly girls. The leaked documents, which Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen brought to light, showed that Meta’s own research found that Instagram can have a toxic effect on teenagers — particularly girls — when they use the app in a way that is passive, comparing their lives to the curated and manipulated content that other users post. Since then, Meta has taken a number of steps that it says are aimed at protecting teens, including parental controls on its Messenger app and a default setting that prevents adults from messaging teens they don’t follow. The company has also made some changes to Instagram, including hiding the number of likes on posts from users under 18. Despite those efforts, Meta is still under intense scrutiny from lawmakers and the public over its impact on teens. That’s why the company is now pushing its competitors to join it in taking steps to protect teens. “We are committed to providing teens with safe, age-appropriate experiences online and have spent a decade developing more than 50 tools and policies designed to protect them,” a Meta spokesperson said. “While we’ve made progress, we know there’s more work to do and are committed to continuing to work with experts, policymakers and industry peers to ensure young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online,” the spokesperson added. The ad, which also ran in other major dailies, calls on TikTok and YouTube to join Meta in a “teen safety summit” that would bring together experts, policymakers and industry peers to discuss ways to keep young people safe online. A TikTok spokesperson said the company has “a number of initiatives underway to protect our users, particularly teens, and we look forward to continuing to work with industry peers and other stakeholders to ensure that young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online.” A YouTube spokesperson said the company has “developed more than 50 features and policies to protect teens and families, and we look forward to continuing to work with others to ensure that young people have access to safe, age-appropriate experiences online.” Snap, which owns Snapchat, also ran a similar ad in The New York Times on October 30. The ads are part of a broader push by Meta to show that it is taking concrete steps to protect teens on its platforms. In September, for example, Meta launched a center that provides resources for parents and teens on how to use the company’s apps in healthy ways. The company has also taken steps to crack down on content that it deems can be harmful to teens, including limiting the reach of posts that contain what it calls “sensitive” content. Meta’s efforts to pressure TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teens come as the company faces growing scrutiny over its impact on young users. Earlier this month, for example, dozens of states sued Meta over allegations that it knowingly engineered its platforms to be addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed on October 25, claims that Meta’s platforms, including Instagram and Facebook, are “defective and dangerous” and that the company knowingly prioritized profits over safety. Meta has denied the allegations, saying that it has developed a number of tools and policies to protect young users. The company is also facing scrutiny from federal lawmakers, who have raised concerns about the impact of Meta’s platforms on young users. In September, for example, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg was grilled by lawmakers during a Senate hearing on the company’s efforts to protect teens on its platforms. Zuckerberg defended the company’s efforts, saying that Meta has developed more than 50 tools and policies to protect young users. But lawmakers expressed frustration that the company is not doing enough to protect teens. “We appreciate that Meta is committed to providing teens with safe, age-appropriate experiences online,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut. “But we need to do more to protect teens from the harms of social media,” Blumenthal added. The pressure on Meta and other social media companies to protect teens is growing as more research emerges about the impact of social media on young users. A recent study, for example, found that social media can have a toxic effect on teens, particularly girls. The study, which was published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, found that teens who spent more time on social media were more likely to experience depression and anxiety. The study’s findings are consistent with Meta’s own research, which found that Instagram can have a toxic effect on teens, particularly girls. The growing scrutiny of Meta and other social media companies is likely to continue as more research emerges about the impact of social media on young users. As the debate over social media’s impact on teens continues, Meta is likely to face continued pressure to do more to protect young users. Meta’s efforts to pressure TikTok and YouTube into joining its efforts to protect teens are part of a broader push by the company to show that it is taking concrete steps to address concerns about its impact on young users. The company is likely to continue to face scrutiny from lawmakers and the public over its impact on teens, and it remains to be seen how effective its efforts will be in addressing these concerns.

·hani.co.kr

Tink Alternatives in 2026: An Honest Developer's Comparison

Most people searching for a Tink alternative aren't angry at Tink. The coverage is real, the docs are decent, and the API does what it says.

  • Tink purchased by Visa in 2022, now focusing on enterprise solutions
  • Alternative APIs offer published pricing, sandbox access, and EU coverage
  • Choice depends on banking needs, pricing models, and integration requirements

·dev.to

More from Saturday 29 August →