Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Diamond clock combines two signals to cut temperature-driven drift

Despite all the advertisements for engagement rings and necklace gifts, natural diamonds are imperfect. Their carbon atoms are arranged in a cubic lattice, but they nonetheless contain several types of crystallographic defects due to impurities that occasionally replace a carbon atom. The most common types of impurities are nitrogen and boron; "Type I" diamonds contain nitrogen impurities, which…

Diamond clock combines two signals to cut temperature-driven drift

Natural diamonds, despite their beauty in jewelry, are not perfect. Impurities such as nitrogen and boron often replace carbon atoms in their cubic lattice structure. Among these, nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers, where a nitrogen atom takes the place of a carbon atom with an adjacent empty lattice spot, are particularly noteworthy.

Scientists at U.S. and German institutions have developed a method to harness the unique properties of NV centers to create a more stable diamond clock. This clock relies on the temperature-insensitive nuclear quadrupole splitting (Q) of the 14N nucleus within the NV centers, combined with the electronic splitting (D) caused by electron spin interactions.

By measuring both the D and Q effects in an ensemble of NV centers, the researchers were able to compensate for temperature-driven drift, reducing the clock's temperature sensitivity by about 10 times at one-second intervals at room temperature. Over a 10-day period, the diamond clock demonstrated a fractional instability below 5 × 10−9 at 200 seconds and 1 × 10−8 at 200,000 seconds, outperforming a rubidium-based clock by a significant margin.

This groundbreaking development could pave the way for compact, multifunctional solid-state clocks and quantum sensors, providing a new level of precision and stability in timekeeping technology.

Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at phys.org →

More in Science

More from Friday 28 August →