What does the Meta settlement mean for the UK? Five things we learned
Other social media firms are yet to respond, while the debate from campaigners is far from over.
The $18 billion settlement reached by Meta with nearly every US state entails far-reaching implications beyond the mere financial compensation. As part of the agreement, Meta's social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram, have committed to implementing multiple safety measures aimed at safeguarding children online. While Meta has not explicitly admitted to any wrongdoing, these measures include time limits, screen time warnings, and enhanced parental controls on their children's accounts.
Initially, these provisions will apply to children in the US, but they could potentially influence the safety policies of social media platforms worldwide.
If these safety features successfully set a precedent, other major tech companies may feel compelled to adopt similar rules. The UK, for instance, already possesses comprehensive online safety regulations through the Online Safety Act. However, the UK government has taken further steps by proposing an outright ban on social media for individuals under 16, set to commence in 2027. In addition to the ban, the government plans to institute curfews and restrictions during specific hours of the day for 16 and 17-year-olds.
The US has taken a slightly different approach to regulating social media access for minors. Initially, the focus was on policing the content accessible on the platforms. Now, the emphasis has shifted towards restricting usage by children. Unlike the UK, where the ban is legally enforced, Meta's new rules in the US will not be a legal imposition. Instead, they will apply primarily to Facebook and Instagram, with a possibility of extending to other platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Snap in the future.
According to Trevor Johnson, a former Meta and TikTok executive, the UK's approach may encourage other countries to seek similar safety features. Johnson believes that the UK's efforts to enforce stricter regulations will empower other nations to demand comparable measures for the safety of their young citizens. Meta's decision to extend these safety measures to other major platforms, including TikTok, YouTube, and Snap, demonstrates a concern for maintaining a level playing field in terms of regulatory standards.
While Meta has been the primary target in this legal dispute, it has also sought to broaden its influence over the broader social media industry. By calling for similar measures from TikTok, YouTube, and Snap, Meta is advocating for a balanced regulatory environment that would prevent one platform from gaining a significant advantage over its competitors by imposing more restrictions on younger users.
This collective approach aligns with Meta's philosophy of ensuring a fair level of protection for all users, regardless of the platform they utilize.
Written by urgent.news from BBC Technology's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.