Karen Attiah Fought the Washington Post and Won
In the frenzied, finger-pointing days following Charlie Kirk’s assassination last year, institutions across the country rushed to appease online mobs and vitriolic politicians who demanded takedowns of anyone critical of the right-wing influencer. In the year since, courts and arbitrators have forced a growing number of institutions to answer to something much more enduring than […]
In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination last year, institutions across the country rushed to appease online mobs and politicians demanding the removal of anyone critical of the right-wing influencer. This led to a growing number of institutions facing legal consequences, with the Washington Post being the latest to be ordered to reinstate Karen Attiah, the opinion columnist fired last year for her social media posts following Kirk's assassination.
Attiah, an 11-year veteran of the Post, was terminated on September 11, just one day after posting comments on Bluesky about the public's response to Kirk's assassination. The Post argued that Attiah's comments had "harmed the paper's reputation and integrity" and "created safety risks" for its staff, but arbitrator Sarah Miller Espinosa dismissed these claims as "unsupported" and "unpersuasive."
Attiah's firing was described as an "absolutely disproportional" penalty by the arbitrator. The Washington Post spokesperson stated that they respect the arbitration process but declined to comment further. Attiah remains open to returning to her role on the Opinion desk but has yet to hear from the paper.
Written by urgent.news from Mother Jones's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
