Kanjama flags court vulnerabilities and appeal bottlenecks

Senior Counsel and Law Society of Kenya President Charles Kanjama has expressed concerns about vulnerabilities within the Kenyan Judiciary, highlighting how accountability processes can be impeded while appeals face procedural roadblocks that delay case resolution. During an interview on August 27, 2026, Kanjama linked these concerns to a nationwide boycott of certain judicial officers by lawyers, which brought attention to the issue of accountability.

Concerned about whether judicial processes are being used to prevent scrutiny, Kanjama pointed to instances where courts have halted preliminary investigations by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) involving judges or judicial officers. Kanjama emphasized that while lawyers continue to seek judicial intervention to resolve disputes, the appeal process often becomes hindered by procedural obstacles, making it difficult to achieve progress.

He reiterated that the Judiciary, as per the constitution, is meant to be the final recourse for Kenyans when the Executive and Parliament fail to address issues, but stressed that judicial independence must go hand-in-hand with accountability. Kanjama also reflected on the Judiciary's evolution since the introduction of the 2010 Constitution, noting that it has become stronger and more independent than before.

However, he cautioned about the need to guard against potential political interference, citing cases where judges consistently issue decisions adverse to the government and higher courts reversing progressive decisions. The conversation also touched on funding, which has increased from Sh18 billion to Sh30 billion over three years, along with the appointment of more judges and magistrates.

Kanjama urged the Judiciary to remain steadfast in upholding constitutional values while ensuring its independence is protected and accountability is maintained.