Was the 6S really the peak iPhone?

In September 2017, Mashable posed a question to its readers: had Apple's innovation plateaued? The article questioned whether the iPhone 6S, released two years prior, marked the pinnacle of iPhone excellence. Former colleague Foster Kamer argued that the iPhone 6S was the perfect phone, possessing speed, optimal size, weight, and essential features such as a headphone jack and Touch ID button.

The article explored the merits of purchasing a slightly older iPhone model, as it is often more affordable and can last for several years. However, the author conceded that for those not interested in the latest features, an older iPhone might suffice. Even with a current iPhone 17 Pro Max, the author found little reason to switch to a previous model, as both the battery life and camera significantly surpassed those of older versions.

Comparing the iPhone 6S to modern devices, the author found the newer models to have superior battery life and camera capabilities. The author also noted the advancements in display technology, which were not present on the iPhone 6S. Although the iPhone 6S was lightweight and practical for basic tasks, it was not particularly special and would likely feel underpowered when compared to current models.

With the imminent release of the iPhone Ultra, a foldable device featuring a larger tablet display, the author argued that the iPhone 6S would be laughably underpowered when used alongside such advanced technology. While some may argue that an older device is the "peak iPhone," the author suggested that such a choice would save money but ultimately result in a less enjoyable experience.

The author concluded that while vintage devices might be appealing to some, they would ultimately struggle to compete with the latest innovations in the smartphone industry.