Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Prosecution witnesses cast doubt on Lindsay Clancy's postpartum psychosis defense

The prosecutors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial are wrapping up their rebuttal testimony. CBS News legal contributor Rebecca Roiphe has more analysis.

Vanity Fair dismissed journalist Brittany Romano from their employ following her presence at Lindsay Clancy's trial, which took place on August 24, 2023. Romano had a personal connection to Clancy and was seen smiling and winking at the live feed of the trial, leading to her being dropped by the magazine. Vanity Fair cited conflicts with their editorial standards and processes as the reason for their decision.

Romano, however, claimed that she was a freelance journalist assigned to the project and never had a contract with Vanity Fair.

The public debate surrounding Lindsay Clancy has intensified, with supporters and critics vehemently opposing each other. A social media war has erupted, with opinions divided over whether to support Clancy, who has been accused of killing her three children, or not.

A New York City-based attorney, Nicole Brenecki, has addressed the question of whether an employer can fire an employee for supporting Lindsay Clancy. Brenecki clarified that the misconception that free speech extends into the workplace and prevents private employers from taking action based on an employee's statements is largely incorrect.

Brenecki explained that the consequences for an employee will depend on various factors, including the jurisdiction, whether the employer is public or private, the specific actions or comments made, and whether they occurred at work or off-duty.

The attorney also discussed the possibility of an employee suing their employer for firing them due to their support of Lindsay Clancy. Brenecki emphasized that while an employee can certainly challenge a termination, simply being fired for expressing a particular viewpoint does not automatically make the employer's actions unlawful.

Legal protections, such as those for political activity, lawful off-duty conduct, or certain forms of expression, might apply and vary by jurisdiction. The employee's legal claim would depend on the specific facts of the case, the employment relationship, and the applicable laws in their area.

Written by urgent.news from Hindustan Times - World News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at cbsnews.com →

More in World

More from Wednesday 26 August →