Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Perplexity launches a local AI agent with zero token costs

All you need is a $5,000 NVIDIA setup.

Perplexity launches a local AI agent with zero token costs

AI company Perplexity is expanding its capabilities into local AI services, unveiling a new local agent called Portable Computer. This local agent is designed to control AI costs, addressing user concerns about high cloud bills. Portable Computer is built upon a hybrid agent inference orchestrator that connects cloud and local inference, outperforming cloud-based agents in accuracy while utilizing Nvidia DGX Spark workstations to run local AI models.

These models, including Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, Qwen 3.6, and Qwen 3.8, are small and efficient, capable of handling complex agentic workflows. By running locally, Perplexity avoids per-token API fees and ensures privacy and intellectual-property protection by keeping tokens within the local device. Although Perplexity's current privacy policy does not directly address Portable Computer, the company has shown its commitment to user privacy through other services.

In benchmark tests, Portable Computer demonstrated competitive performance against other agents like Pi and Hermes, matching or exceeding them in accuracy while using fewer tokens. Perplexity's success hinges on the availability of open-weight models and powerful local hardware, with the possibility of Nvidia investing $30 billion in the company potentially paving the way for future revenue streams.

Written by urgent.news from The Register's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at androidauthority.com →

More in AI

A year of coding by talking: what I gained and what I lost

2024 was the year AI was everywhere. The ads, the praise, the feeling that something had already been decided without me. I am in my fifties. I had to decide whether to watch or take part.

  • A 50-year-old father aimed for financial freedom through automated trading.
  • Initially used GPT and Claude, but struggled with model switching and code management.
  • Success in automating data-entry, but failed to develop a cohesive trading system.

More from Wednesday 26 August →