Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Fluoxetine improves glucose metabolism and regulates hepatic and neural gene expression in diabetic mice

Scientific Reports, Published online: 26 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41598-026-68006-7 Fluoxetine improves glucose metabolism and regulates hepatic and neural gene expression in diabetic mice

This study investigated the impact of fluoxetine on glucose metabolism and gene regulation in diabetic mice. A total of 20 male Balb/c mice were divided into four groups: control, fluoxetine-treated non-diabetic, untreated diabetic, and fluoxetine-treated diabetic. Fluoxetine was given orally at a dosage of 25 mg/kg/day for 15 days.

The expression of several genes related to glucose metabolism, insulin, and neuroregulation was measured using real-time PCR. Fluoxetine treatment resulted in lower fasting blood glucose levels in diabetic mice, but did not affect AKT1 expression. Hepatic expression of GLUT4 and INSR was increased in fluoxetine-treated diabetic mice compared to untreated diabetics (p < 0.01).

In the brain, fluoxetine restored SIRT1 expression, reduced lncRNA NEAT1 levels, and increased lncRNA MEG3 levels in diabetic mice (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). Kidney tissue analysis revealed that fluoxetine partially reduced diabetic alterations, but did not fully restore renal histology. The results suggest that fluoxetine mainly affects glucose metabolism and neuroregulation, rather than providing structural protection.

While these findings offer preliminary evidence that fluoxetine might be a potential treatment for comorbid depression and diabetes, larger studies with more comprehensive metabolic analyses and protein-level validation are required to confirm these observations and understand the underlying mechanisms.

Written by urgent.news from Scientific Reports's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at nature.com →

More in AI

What Actually Breaks When You Put AI Agents In Front Of Real Customers

I have spent the last year building AI automation systems for small businesses. Chatbots, multi agent workflows, the kind of stuff that looks great in a demo and then meets an actual customer who types "idk just fix it" and breaks everything. Most articles about AI agents talk about architecture.

  • Real users often provide contradictory, half-formed inputs that break AI agents.
  • Explicitly instructing the model to say "I don't know" when uncertain is crucial.
  • Maintenance is the most significant challenge due to frequent API and model changes.

More from Wednesday 26 August →