Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

The difference between ‘agree to disagree’ and ‘you’re wrong’ — or why you hate that guy who always corrects you

New research from Carnegie Mellon and Michigan suggests the line between "different beliefs" and "false beliefs" shapes trust, distrust and avoidance.

The difference between ‘agree to disagree’ and ‘you’re wrong’ — or why you hate that guy who always corrects you

Why do disagreements about vaccines, climate change, or elections often feel so personal? Our research suggests it's not just because other people have different beliefs. It's because we think those beliefs are mistaken. We are behavioral scientists studying how beliefs influence politics and everyday life. Our research reveals that people are more disturbed by others' beliefs if they believe those beliefs are incorrect, not just different from their own.

For instance, two people may disagree about immigration levels, but if one believes immigrants commit more crime than U.S.-born residents, the other believing the opposite, their disagreement becomes a conflict over reality and truth. This distinction matters as public debate over polarization often starts with the idea that people prefer others who think like them – "birds of a feather flock together."

Social scientists call this belief homophily, and many researchers have studied how shared beliefs shape friendships, neighborhoods, media habits, and political life. Our four-study research with over 2,000 U.S. adults suggests that the story of why we and others react differently to disagreements is incomplete. People are especially bothered when they are convinced someone is wrong, not just has a different belief.

Wrong beliefs fuel avoidance. In one study, participants recalled situations with differing beliefs versus incorrect beliefs. Those recalling the latter reported feeling more disturbed, frustrated, and upset than those with differing beliefs. In another study, participants' emotional reactions depended on their confidence in the opposing view's correctness.

The more confident they were that the author's belief was incorrect, the more disturbed they felt and the more likely they were to avoid, distrust, or block that person. Lastly, participants read fictional stories about neighbors with either different or incorrect beliefs about a politician's corruption. They were more disturbed when the belief was framed as incorrect.

False beliefs make people frustrated due to consequences, threatening shared reality, and signaling biases or irrationality. When convinced someone is wrong, people may view them as biased or self-interested, causing social threat. Even if people don't want to avoid those who disagree with them, they want to avoid those they deem mistaken. This explains why some debates become emotionally intense, especially online.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in Finance & Markets

Name Change and Consolidation Approved

QUEBEC CITY, Aug. 24, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PDI Gold Limited (ASX:PDI, TSX:PDI) (“PDI Gold” or the “Company”) (previously Predictive Discovery Limited) advises that following shareholder approval…

Afreximbank profit jumps 30% to $535 million as lending swells

The African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) has reported a net income of $534.7 million for the first half of 2026, representing a 30% increase from the $412.7 million recorded in the corresponding…

  • Afreximbank's net income jumps 30% to $534.7 million in H1 2026
  • Lending activities expand 5.7% to $35.4 billion, boosting profits
  • Net interest income rises 22% to $1.0 billion, fees and commissions grow 15%

More from Monday 24 August →