OSP’s swift response to extortion allegation doesn’t mean selective investigations – Senanu

Anti-corruption advocate Edem Senanu defended the rapid response of the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) to an alleged extortion case brought by the Ghana Gold Board’s Chief Executive, Sammy Gyamfi, against Parliament’s Minority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin. Senanu's remarks come after concerns were raised about the OSP’s seeming preference in handling certain cases, particularly in comparison to the bribery investigation involving Aksa Energy.

Senanu clarified that the two cases are not comparable, citing the fact that the Aksa Energy matter was a lengthy, joint investigation with United States authorities. He emphasized that the OSP would have been legally bound to keep details of its US collaboration confidential, as publicly disclosing such information could allow suspects to alter their behavior or avoid prosecution.

Senanu stressed that the OSP's handling of this case was different from its response to a locally reported allegation, brought directly to its attention. He explained that specialised agencies like the OSP may need to improve public understanding of how investigations are conducted, especially when involving international partners.

According to Senanu, premature disclosures could jeopardize ongoing cases. He also pointed out that the OSP's prompt assessment of the extortion allegation was justified because it is a local matter and had been brought to its attention, making it reasonable for the office to disclose its intention to investigate. Senanu dismissed claims that the OSP's swift response was indicative of selective enforcement, arguing that such differences in timing and response methods should not be taken as evidence that the agency is deliberately choosing cases to pursue.