Another hatchet job on Megan Choritz—but is it journalism?

The article in question is part of the SAJR, a publication known for its controversial reputation among some readers. It's been labeled with names like "rag," "yellow press," and "Zionist front for Netanyahu." Despite this, the author has a collection that includes works from controversial figures such as Netanyahu himself, and has never shied away from engaging with the material. While the author acknowledges that not everyone's taste aligns with their own, they argue that it's crucial to understand opposing viewpoints.

One recent article in the SAJR featured Tali, who objected to an X post by another author stating that "Israel’s murderous soldiers are 'filth'." Later, Tali returned to the story of Megan Choritz, a professor who had accused Mendelsohn of genocide and other derogatory statements. Instead of focusing on Choritz's plea, the article took on an adversarial tone, defending Choritz's actions.

The headline, "Choritz defends slur against Mendelsohn," suggests that the piece is biased. The author argues that Choritz was defending a slur against Mendelsohn, claiming it was an abuse of the judicial process and a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) case. Choritz's attorney, Simon Dippenaar, argued that Choritz's statements, while critical, were still considered opinion and were based on true facts.

The author concludes by discussing the broader issues of Zionism, anti-Zionism, and free speech, emphasizing that Choritz's stance falls within the realm of BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions).