A Natalie Harp Conspiracy Theory (Not Really)
A version of the below article first appeared in David Corn’s newsletter, Our Land. The newsletter comes out twice a week (most of the time) and provides behind-the-scenes stories and articles about politics, media, and culture. Subscribing costs just $5 a month—but you can sign up for a free 30-day trial. It’s very easy to be a conspiracy-monger. Let’s give it […]
A recent surge in chatter about Natalie Harp, Donald Trump's 35-year-old aide, has sparked an alleged conspiracy theory. Dubbed the "Human Printer," Harp is always by Trump's side, typing his social media posts and handling sensitive information. She was even present in the catering compartment during Trump's covert flight to another aircraft during a security threat in Turkey.
The intrigue surrounding Harp intensified after Senator Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat, made remarks comparing Trump's behavior to that of a spoiled mogul. While some criticized Ossoff for insinuating a romantic relationship between Harp and Trump, others saw the conversation as a necessary exploration of Harp's peculiar relationship with the president.
However, a more eyebrow-raising aspect of the story comes to light with reports that Harp had declined to obtain a security clearance for over a year during her tenure in the White House. This lapse is considered a security risk, as Harp had constant access to top-secret information. What's even more perplexing is that Harp did eventually receive a clearance but the reasons behind her delay remain unclear.
Adding to the mystery, Harp previously worked for One America News Network (OAN), a right-leaning cable news outlet with a history of promoting Republican interests and downplaying Russian aggression. OAN has been accused of airing content directly influenced by Russian propaganda. Given Harp's past working relationship with OAN, questions arise about potential influence on her uncanny access to sensitive information in the White House.
Written by urgent.news from Mother Jones's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
