Voting rights experts skeptical over Trump pledge of 1,000 election monitors
Department of Justice plan raises questions over its ability to recruit so many people – and what they would do Former officials and voting rights experts have expressed skepticism over a pledge by the Trump administration to dispatch 1,000 monitors across the country to scrutinize November’s US midterm elections . While the Department of Justice (DoJ) has expressed hope that the operation will…
Former officials and voting rights experts have expressed skepticism over the Trump administration's pledge to dispatch 1,000 election monitors across the country for the midterm elections in November. While the Department of Justice (DoJ) has expressed hope that this will be the largest monitoring effort in its history, there are concerns about the department's ability to recruit so many people and the role they would play in scrutinizing the elections.
Former DoJ officials have noted that they have frequently sent hundreds of monitors in recent years, but this year's effort could prove to be logistically challenging. Former DoJ official Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles suggested that even if the department managed to recruit 1,000 monitors, their role would likely be limited to observing and not interrupting the election process.
Levitt also pointed out that local election officials can easily dismiss any troublemakers. Former justice department officials estimate that the department sent 289 monitors in 2022 and 714 in 2024, but for this year's elections, they aim to send the largest team yet. However, they have faced challenges as scores of personnel have left the civil rights division under Trump.
So far, the department has sent 75 monitors to over 200 polling locations in five states, including Minnesota, Michigan, and Arizona. In Minnesota, state officials decided to monitor the monitors after immigration enforcement issues left a deep distrust of federal authorities. So far, there have been no major disruptions or obstructions caused by the monitors.
Written by urgent.news from The Guardian US's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.