More color-on-color uniform matchups would make USC-UCLA less special

The article argues that conducting more color-on-color uniform matchups, such as both USC and UCLA wearing their home uniforms in the Crosstown Showdown, would diminish the special nature of their rivalry. The history of the USC-UCLA matchup is significant, as it pays homage to the era when the Trojans and Bruins shared the Coliseum, making it a true home game for both teams.

The tradition of each school wearing their home colors for alternating games at the Rose Bowl or the Coliseum adds to the uniqueness of the rivalry. Thousands of USC students, fans, and band members travel to Pasadena or Los Angeles for the short trip to paint the stadium Cardinal or blue, respectively, showcasing the excitement surrounding these matchups.

If both teams wore their home uniforms in every game, the iconic uniform clash would lose its significance, and the rivalry would become just another regular game. The article draws a parallel to the College Football Playoff expansion, suggesting that adding more games would dilute the value of the existing ones. Additionally, the author expresses personal preference for USC's white road uniforms, as they evoke memories of the team's successful road performances against tough opponents.

The author also highlights concerns raised by the NFL regarding its "Color Rush" campaign, where issues like color blindness and confusion among fans arose. In conclusion, the author asserts that the USC-UCLA rivalry is a unique and special tradition in college football, and altering the uniform matchups would take away from this iconic aspect of the Crosstown Showdown.

The article emphasizes that college football already has enough problems and that leaders should focus on addressing more pressing issues rather than tinkering with something that is not broken.