Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Editions

AI

AI reshapes India's IT services sector contracts as clients demand more for less

Outsourcing giants like Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro, HCLTech and Cognizant are rejigging business models, increasingly tying fees to performance outcomes instead of hours worked, as clients demand steep price cuts and more productivity.

AI reshapes India's IT services sector contracts as clients demand more for less

Artificial intelligence is transforming India's IT services sector, with customers demanding more value for less. Major players like Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, Wipro, HCLTech, and Cognizant are adapting their business models to tie fees to performance outcomes rather than hours worked. Clients are also using AI to perform tasks in-house, leading to shorter contracts and a more level playing field for smaller competitors.

This shift has resulted in a decline in contracts for traditional IT service providers, with the Nifty IT index dropping by a fifth this year. Companies are now focusing on measurable outcomes, with TCS reporting that 80% of their contracts in finance, human resources, and other business services are now based on performance measures.

This performance-based approach has led to some firms making rash decisions, such as Tech Mahindra's reluctance to guarantee prices despite rising chip costs. Despite the challenges, some smaller firms are thriving, with double-digit revenue growth for at least eight quarters in a row.

Written by urgent.news from Economic Times Tech's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at economictimes.indiatimes.com →

More in AI

Does running a document through a rewriting tool change what you have to declare?

I work on a rewriting tool. This is the question we get asked most and answer least comfortably, and it comes up in dev circles as often as it does in academic ones now that a model drafts the first…

  • Running a document through a rewriting tool doesn't change AI disclosure requirement.
  • Tool alters content expression, not erase AI involvement fact.
  • Disclosures focus on writer's process, not tool's output.

When the product works but nothing moves

The demo is impressive. The output is clean. Early users say "wow." Then they go back to doing it the old way. This is one of the common patterns I see in AI tools right now — the build is undeniably…

  • AI tool creates high-quality output but fails to drive adoption.
  • Adoption problem separate from production problem; requires integration into existing workflow.
  • Tool may not fit workflow, be owned by individual, or be ahead of its time.

More from Friday 21 August →