Why dialogue between March and March and AfriForum is not betrayal
Movements like March and March emerged because the state failed to enforce immigration policy and address unemployment concerns.
The recent meeting between AfriForum and March and March has sparked heated debate, with critics accusing March and March of selling out to the white establishment. However, this dialogue between civil society organisations is not a betrayal, but rather a demonstration of democratic principles. South Africa's transition to democracy was built on conversations between formerly oppressed groups and the ruling National Party, showing that engagement with adversaries can be a heroic act.
The current disillusionment with the political elite and their failure to enforce immigration policies has led citizens to seek alternatives, such as March and March. These grassroots organisations reflect a growing hunger for accountability and change, and engaging with AfriForum is not a sign of weakness, but rather a strength in our democracy, which guarantees freedom of association and speech.
Brief written by urgent.news from The Citizen's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
