Theo James dubs self too old to play James Bond
The Gentlemen star is one year younger than Daniel Craig was when Casino Royale premiered.
The hunt for the new James Bond has been ongoing for an extended period, prompting producers to consider actors who could gradually age into the role. Michael G. Wilson, a pre-Amazon Bond producer, once stated that the ideal candidate would be in his thirties, which initially placed Tom Holland in the lineup. Despite this, the lengthy search has possibly excluded certain individuals, such as 41-year-old Theo James.
James himself acknowledges his age, stating in a recent British GQ profile, "I'm definitely too old now, for one." This assessment may not be entirely accurate, however, as Daniel Craig began the Casino Royale franchise at 42 and Pierce Brosnan starred in Golden Eye at the same age. Yet, the interview suggests that James' reluctance is more of a polite excuse than a genuine reason.
He elaborates that playing Bond "would be an example of a place you could never come back from," following his experiences with the YA adaptation Divergent, which led to him and his father fleeing fans in the streets of Spain and causing interruptions during his GQ interview. James generally refrains from discussing Divergent directly, but he frequently describes it negatively, likening it to "an avatar for IP."
Consequently, the prospect of taking on the Bond role in the franchise's Amazon era may not excite him.
Written by urgent.news from The A.V. Club's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.