Why the US is going after the International Criminal Court
Marco Rubio, Donald Trump's secretary of state, has announced sanctions against two members of the International Criminal Court, including its president. Rubio's pressure on the court has far-reaching consequences.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has taken a strong stance against the International Criminal Court (ICC), branding it as corrupt and politically motivated. He claims the court has abused its authority and exceeded its mandate, leading to sanctions against ICC President Tomoko Akane and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Seye. These sanctions involve freezing their US-held assets and cutting them off from the US financial system.
The ICC, established in 2002, has been holding individuals accountable for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity. Unlike the International Court of Justice, the ICC has 125 members, not all 193 UN member states, and includes countries like the US, Russia, and China. Rubio's actions come after a series of diplomatic pressures from Washington, which aims to change the voting behavior of nations towards the ICC.
Legal experts say the US's recent escalation is significant, as it has publicly declared a campaign against the court, involving various forms of pressure on other countries. Despite not being a member, the US can still face ICC prosecutions for crimes committed on its soil. The ICC's roots lie in the Nuremberg trials following World War II, which marked the birth of modern international criminal law.
Advocates argue that accountability is crucial, especially in conflicts like Ukraine, Iran, and Gaza, where those primarily responsible for serious crimes often go unpunished.
Written by urgent.news from DW News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
