MADLANGA COMMISSION: Adams puts Idac’s evidence under scrutiny while affidavit dispute deepens
National Coloured Congress MP Fadiel Adams has disputed key aspects of testimony from Idac members, raising questions over his original complaint, conflicting versions of his statement and the handling of evidence that became central to an investigation that rocked the police.
National Coloured Congress MP Fadiel Adams has questioned the credibility of Idac members' testimony, which has deepened the dispute over an investigation that led to the suspension of the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner. Adams alleged that confidential Crime Intelligence documents were secretly placed under his parliamentary office door, revealing alleged corruption, misuse of funds and manipulation of police vetting processes.
This claim triggered an Investigative Directorate Against Corruption (Idac) investigation, resulting in the arrest of Crime Intelligence chief Dumisani Khumalo in June 2025. However, the Madlanga Commission, which is examining Adams' allegations, has uncovered significant concerns about the authenticity of the evidence and the scope of the investigation.
Adams' original complaint mentioned three individuals, but the investigation broadened to include seven Idac members, including Khumalo, on charges related to improper hiring. These charges have since been withdrawn, leaving questions about the expansion of the investigation. The Madlanga Commission is also investigating the discrepancy between Adams' initial affidavit and the supplementary statements taken by Idac prosecutor advocate Drushantha Ramsamy on 6 January 2025.
Adams maintains that he provided only one account of the events during his interview and has called for the recording of the disputed interview to be made public to address the concerns raised.
Written by urgent.news from Daily Maverick's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
