Group alleges bias in transfer of case challenging Tinubu’s academic credentials

The Centre for Reform and Public Advocacy (CFRPA) has strongly criticized the decision by the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to transfer a case challenging President Bola Tinubu's academic credentials from its original location in Kano to Abuja. The CFRPA filed a suit on June 26, 2026, in Kano, raising serious constitutional concerns under Sections 131 and 137(1)(j) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended. However, the Chief Judge, under pressure from Tinubu's legal team, moved the case to Abuja.

Kalu Kalu Agu, Head of the Legal Unit at CFRPA, vehemently rejects the transfer decision, citing it as a clear demonstration of bias and a lack of impartiality. The CFRPA argues that the quick and seemingly preferential transfer creates a reasonable apprehension of bias favoring Tinubu and his legal team. They further contend that moving the case to Abuja imposes significant hardship, cost, and inconvenience on the Plaintiff, as many of their witnesses and members reside in Kano.

The CFRPA accuses the transfer of being a deliberate attempt to avoid public scrutiny in Kano and escape being tried in the North.

The CFRPA emphasizes that the judiciary must be seen as impartial and independent. They demand that the Chief Judge immediately reverse the transfer order and permit the case to continue in Kano, where it was originally filed. The CFRPA remains firmly committed to upholding the rule of law, constitutionalism, and accountability in public office. They assert that they will utilize all lawful means to combat any attempts to compromise the integrity of the justice system.