Administration Moves to Open National Forests to Roadbuilding, Drilling, and Logging
This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. The Trump administration said on Tuesday it plans to rescind the “roadless rule” that has protected old-growth forests in the US for 25 years, potentially opening up almost 45 million acres of national forests to road construction, drilling, and logging. Conservationists had…
The Trump administration announced on Tuesday its intention to repeal the "roadless rule" that has safeguarded old-growth forests across the United States for the past 25 years. This proposed change could potentially expose nearly 45 million acres of national forests to activities such as road building, drilling, and logging. Conservationists had anticipated the announcement, as Brooke Rollins, the Secretary of Agriculture under the Trump administration, had previously criticized the rule as "overly restrictive" and an "obstacle" to development.
The US Forest Service, a department within the Department of Agriculture, formally submitted the proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule in its entirety. Environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and others, have strongly criticized the plan, emphasizing the rule's role in protecting wildlife habitat, providing clean air and water, and preserving ancient forests.
Alex Craven, the Forest Campaign Manager for the Sierra Club, emphasized that the rule is crucial in preventing industrial development and maintaining the integrity of these forests. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) urged the public to participate in the comment period to defend these forests from the administration's plans. They also highlighted the economic value of these forests, which support thousands of jobs and generate billions in economic activity.
The administration argues that the repeal will remove barriers to managing forests and combating wildfires. Rollins stated that outdated restrictions have prevented the implementation of treatments that improve forest health and reduce wildfire risks. Tom Schultz, the Chief of the Forest Service, reiterated that active forest management is essential.
According to Schultz, more than 40% of inventoried roadless areas, primarily in the western regions, have high or very high wildfire hazard potential, but only 5% of these areas have received hazardous fuels reduction treatments since 2014.
However, environmental groups argue that the administration's claim overlooks the fact that roads typically lead to more ignitions and wildfires, rather than fewer. The Sierra Club's Alex Craven pointed out that the roadless rule allows for targeted actions to reduce hazardous fuels, but it does not permit using wildfire as an excuse to open pristine forests to industrial exploitation and road construction.
The Tongass National Forest in Alaska, the largest roadless area, is particularly significant as it stores substantial amounts of carbon and is home to diverse wildlife, including brown and black bears, wolves, and bald eagles. Emma Powell, the Government Affairs Manager at the Alaska Wilderness League, expressed concern over the plan, stating that America's last great backcountry forests are not "bargaining chips."
She emphasized the economic value of these landscapes, which support fisheries, tourism, and outdoor recreation, generating job opportunities and billions in economic activity.
The public has until September 21 to submit comments on the proposed rule reversal. Critics, including Randi Spivak, the Public Lands Policy Director at the Center for Biological Diversity, warn that this move represents the largest evisceration of public lands protection in American history and goes against the desires of Americans. Once roads are constructed for commercial logging and industrial development, reversing the process would be nearly impossible.
Written by urgent.news from Mother Jones's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.