Urgent.News

One page, thousands of outlets. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

The Problem Isn’t AI. It’s the Pace.

Swipe and there is food at the door. Swipe and there is a date on Thursday. Swipe and there is a stranger's car outside taking you home. Ask for a function and there is code. Ask for a design and there is a mockup. Ask for a summary of a forty page document and it is done before you have finished reading the first page yourself. None of this felt like a decision. It arrived, and we adapted to the…

The speed of artificial intelligence development is not the problem, but rather the gap between how quickly technology advances and how slowly we adapt to those changes, says the author. They acknowledge that AI capabilities are growing rapidly, with tools like Vite and Rollup accelerating the JavaScript toolchain, and AI models building on each other without a plateau.

This compounding gap creates a challenge where no single person can become deeply expert in everything, leading to codebases that stack multiple eras of tooling, with nobody left who comprehends the bottom layer. The author contrasts this with past technological advancements, which had plateaus allowing for adaptation, whereas the current AI development process lacks a pause.

They argue that the problem lies in the slow-moving scaffolding around biology, such as norms, laws, professional identity, and institutions, all of which evolve at a much slower pace compared to technology. The author acknowledges that the desire to keep up with AI advancements is overwhelming, but suggests a more constructive approach: deliberately choosing what to not keep up with, and finding peace with that decision.

This involves focusing on a short list of things to go deep on, while letting go of the much longer list of tools and advancements that pass by. For the author, this means being selective about adopting new tools until they have proven their worth, and avoiding the notion of personal failure in the face of rapid change.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

Your AI-Generated Code Might Not Be Yours

If you use GitHub Copilot, Claude, Cursor or any other AI coding assistant to write production code, the legal ownership of what you ship is less settled than your licence agreement implies.

More from Tuesday 18 August →