Bipartisan 'Uprising' Against Flock Cameras: a Larger Fight Against Big Tech and Surveillance?
Politico notes that over 20 local jurisdictions in America "either stopped using Flock cameras or began the process of doing so in July, according to a tracker maintained by DeFlock, an activist group that has been mapping the company. It's the highest amount in a single month since they began tracking in 2021." Some local officials said the public safety promises weren't worth the cost. The…
In July, over 20 American cities either halted or planned to discontinue their use of Flock cameras, according to a tracker by DeFlock, an activist organization monitoring the technology. This surge in opposition marks the largest monthly decrease since the group initiated tracking in 2021. Local officials expressed dissatisfaction with the cameras, stating that they did not meet the promise of enhancing public safety.
Eric Couture, a Democratic first selectman from Killingworth, Connecticut, highlighted that Flock's cameras were a net negative. The backlash against Flock cameras aligns with broader concerns about technology's role in modern society, including debates surrounding artificial intelligence and the construction of data centers. Activists see Flock cameras as symbolic of growing distrust towards tech giants and their potential to infringe upon civil liberties and democratic principles.
The campaign against Flock cameras is seen as a catalyst for a larger movement against the tech industry and the political establishments they influence. The uprising, characterized by grassroots protests and playful clashes with authorities, reflects a public desire to resist what many perceive as an overreach by tech corporations.
One humorous protest involved a man pointing out the valuable metals in the cameras during a city council meeting, adding a unique twist to the conflict.
Written by urgent.news from Slashdot's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
