Urgent.News

One page, thousands of outlets. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

AI is not the advantage, build what competitors cannot copy

In one afternoon, she sorts customer comments, spots a recurring problem, explores possible solutions, improves the packaging copy, and drafts a clearer process for her team. Work that might once have taken weeks takes days. This is the exciting part of AI. Her competitors have access to similar tools. They can ask similar questions, draft […] The post AI is not the advantage, build what…

AI is not the advantage, build what competitors cannot copy

AI technology is not a guaranteed advantage for businesses. While it can speed up processes and tasks, it can also be easily replicated by competitors. The real question for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Southeast Asia is not about how to use AI, but what AI can help them create that competitors cannot easily duplicate.

For example, a Thai food business could reduce processing waste, an Indonesian supplier could improve machine maintenance, and a Singapore company could develop a better system for a specific industry. These companies do not need to become large tech firms to benefit from AI; they simply need to use it close to their customers, work, and problems.

However, speed alone is not enough; a faster copy is still just a copy. The real advantage comes from unique knowledge, expertise, and the intangible aspects of a business that cannot be easily copied. This could include better formulas, manufacturing methods, workflows, or features that solve difficult problems. These aspects may not be easily visible but can result in lower prices, higher quality, or faster delivery.

SMEs often possess these assets without realizing they are intellectual property, referring to them as experience, know-how, or customer loyalty. Businesses must decide how to protect these valuable aspects. They can either keep them secret as trade secrets, protected through confidentiality agreements, or disclose them as patents, which provide a fixed-term monopoly in exchange for public disclosure.

The choice depends on the nature of the invention, its uniqueness, and the ease with which competitors could replicate it. Ultimately, the focus should be on solving problems and creating value, not on paperwork or legalities.

Written by urgent.news from e27's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at e27.co →

More in AI

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf: Which AI Code Editor Wins in 2026?

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf: Which AI Code Editor Wins in 2026? The AI code editor war is real. Developers are switching tools every few months chasing the best autocomplete, the smartest…

  • Cursor excels in autocomplete quality, particularly multi-line completions, scoring 9/10
  • Cursor's @codebase feature indexes entire repository for semantic codebase understanding
  • Windsurf's Cascade feature stands out for agentic coding and multi-file task coordination

Anthropic Criticized For Adding Watermarks to Text that Claude Generates - or Processes

This week Anthropic announced its Claude chatbot will watermark the text it generates, reports the blog Futurism. "It works by making subtle changes in the AI's word choices across the text it…

  • Anthropic adds watermarks to Claude-generated text to comply with EU AI Act.
  • Watermark alters word choices, detectable with specialized tools.
  • Concerns raised about AI-assisted writing being stigmatized.

More from Monday 17 August →