105 years on, Springboks and All Blacks still rugby’s greatest rivalry
For more than a century, the Springboks and All Blacks have repeatedly battled for rugby supremacy, from their first meeting in 1921 to the modern World Cup era.
Since the inception of rugby, the enduring rivalry between the New Zealand All Blacks and South Africa's Springboks has captured global attention. This intense 105-year contest has produced countless unforgettable moments and dramatic encounters. When the two teams first faced off in 1921, a three-match series ended in a draw, setting the stage for future battles for the world's top rugby honors.
Since 1921, the Springboks and All Blacks have frequently vied for the unofficial or official world championship crown. From the Springboks' 1921 tour to New Zealand to recent clashes in 2025, both sides have historically been among the sport's elite. The two nations have competed in a staggering 37 meetings overall, with South Africa claiming 20 victories, the All Blacks 15, and two draws.
During the Rugby World Cup era beginning in 1987, the All Blacks won the inaugural tournament, while South Africa claimed four titles, England one, and the remaining six divided between the rivals. In recent years, the tide has shifted in South Africa's favor, with five of the last six meetings resulting in a Springbok win. The 2023 World Cup final in Paris was particularly pivotal, as South Africa emerged victorious.
Now, in the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry tour of 2025, the Springboks will face the All Blacks on home soil in Wellington, with the opening Test scheduled for August 22. The stakes are high as New Zealand, traditionally favored on tours to South Africa, will be up against the Springboks as clear favorites. Questions remain about how New Zealand will cope with the Boks' defensive intensity and whether South Africa can handle the All Blacks' attacking firepower.
This latest chapter is poised to further cement the storied legacy of the world's most celebrated rugby rivalry.
Written by urgent.news from IOL's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
