Urgent.News

600+ sources. One page. See who else covered it.

Editions

Tech

I Built AnswerTrace . GitHub Discussions Analytics for Your README

I noticed GitHub profiles show a lot about code contributions, but not much about contributions through GitHub Discussions . So I built AnswerTrace . AnswerTrace analyzes public GitHub Discussions activity and turns it into a small SVG widget for your README. It currently shows: Accepted Answers Total Upvotes Top Community First Accepted Answer It can also update automatically with GitHub…

GitHub profiles typically display information about code contributions, but they offer limited insight into contributions made through GitHub Discussions. This led the creator, Antoni Loukis, to develop AnswerTrace. AnswerTrace is a tool that examines public GitHub Discussions activity and presents the data as a small SVG widget that can be integrated into a README file. The widget displays several key metrics, including the number of accepted answers, total upvotes, the top community member, and the first accepted answer.

The tool is designed to be flexible and can automatically update its data using GitHub Actions. To use AnswerTrace, developers need to include a specific configuration in their GitHub Actions workflow. This configuration specifies the GitHub username of the Discussions, a personal access token for authentication, the output file for the SVG widget, the accent color for the widget, and other optional settings.

AnswerTrace was released as open-source software and is available on GitHub Marketplace. Users can find the tool by visiting the marketplace page or accessing the source code on GitHub. The creator of AnswerTrace is still in the early stages of development and is actively seeking feedback from users. They are particularly interested in discovering other GitHub Discussions metrics that could be valuable to the community, indicating a commitment to continually improve and expand the tool's capabilities based on real-world usage.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

More from Saturday 15 August →