2006 marked the first time Disney's Broadway ambitions stumbled
Tarzan was a big swing and a miss.
In 2006, Disney's Broadway ambitions faced a significant setback with the production of Tarzan the musical. Despite Disney's successful track record of adapting its films to the stage, such as Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King, Tarzan proved to be a notable disappointment. The musical struggled to maintain the same level of success as its predecessors, leaving both audiences and critics underwhelmed.
The adaptation of Tarzan deviated from the previous productions in several ways. Unlike the films, where the characters sang, the movie version had Tarzan perform spoken dialogue instead of singing. This change posed challenges for the stage adaptation, as musical theatre relies heavily on song to advance the narrative and evoke emotion.
Additionally, the film's songs were characterized by repetitive melodies and a focus on capturing feelings rather than propelling the story forward, a trait that proved difficult to translate onto the stage. Moreover, Disney Theatre Productions had set a tighter deadline for Tarzan compared to its other Broadway productions, which may have contributed to the show's rushed development.
When it finally opened in May 2006, it premiered with a dazzling shipwreck sequence before rapidly losing steam. The first 10 to 15 minutes of the show were hailed as spectacular, but the rest of the musical fell short of expectations. The energetic, airborne sequences that were so effective in the film proved repetitive and tiring on stage.
Furthermore, the ballad-heavy score, composed by Phil Collins, failed to captivate audiences beyond familiar themes. The musical's excessive reliance on aerial stunts and the lengthy, unexciting dialogue between characters resulted in a lackluster experience for both children and adults alike. Ultimately, Tarzan's run on Broadway lasted only a year, a stark contrast to the lengthy runs of its successful counterparts.
Written by urgent.news from The A.V. Club's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.