CORRUPTION-BUSTING: Theatre of consequences — Madlanga Commission needs an extended run

The Madlanga Commission, investigating alleged criminality, political interference and corruption in South Africa's criminal justice system, has garnered surprising acclaim from a nation weary of inquiries without consequences. People are praising the commission for its gripping theatricality and the social media memes it generates from powerful figures being exposed under examination.

But the commission's impact goes beyond entertainment, as there appear to be consequences leading towards Act III of a three-part play: Exposure, Arrests, Punishment.

The intensity of praise for the commission is even more remarkable when acknowledging that everyone is susceptible to corruption in South Africa, from syndicates milking billion-rand contracts to overlooking units in the electricity meter. The Sesotho saying, matsoho a hlatswana (hands wash each other), illustrates how things are done within crumbling systems, sometimes with enthusiasm, sometimes with resentment, sometimes out of desperation. However, only those with strong morals and serious money can stand apart from this way of living.

The enthusiasm for the commission stems from two key elements: first, the realization that while everyone is corrupt, they are not stupid; second, the commission is targeting big fish. The audience is filled with resentment and jealousy at the greed of senior officials looting the public purse. The commission's audience appreciates its teeth and willingness to use them, unlike previous commissions that have become weary due to a lack of consequences.

The commission's success is due to several factors, including the serious whistleblower General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who was taken seriously and can protect himself, and the commission's use of inquisitorial methods that sidestep South Africa's adversarial legal system. Additionally, the commission was given powers of summons, search, seizure, and referral of matters for immediate criminal investigation, ensuring that referrals go directly to a Special Investigating Task Team set up after the interim report.

The commissioners, evidence leaders, investigators, and secretariat have demonstrated how state institutions can work openly, efficiently, and with purpose. The success of the commission has sparked suggestions for more legislation, policies, regulations, and institutions, but the fundamental point is that people must make these innovations work.

The real value of the commission is the sharp, sobering effect of big fish being hooked, sending a powerful message to those lower down the food chain to cut out corruption to avoid ending up in jail.