Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

AI in schools brings back pen and paper

A child sitting down to complete homework in 2026 has more assistance within reach than any previous generation. A chatbot can explain a maths problem, suggest an essay structure, summarise a chapter and correct a paragraph within seconds. The same child may spend much of the school day moving between an interactive board, a laptop and a tablet. Amid this abundance of technology, one of the most…

AI in schools brings back pen and paper

In 2026, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in schools has sparked a reevaluation of traditional learning tools such as pens and paper. Chatbots are now capable of assisting students with various tasks, including explaining mathematical problems, suggesting essay structures, summarizing chapters, and correcting paragraphs within seconds. This abundance of technology has led schools and governments to closely examine the role of screens in education, focusing on areas like distraction, AI, and the value of handwriting.

In Denmark, response to concerns about AI cheating has resulted in upper-secondary students having to defend certain written examination assignments orally, with schools instructed to monitor computer screens during exams and encourage more controlled assignments. These measures were introduced in light of unauthorized AI use and highlight the potential shift in how knowledge is assessed.

Research indicates that handwriting engages the brain differently than typing, with brain activity patterns being more elaborate during handwriting. This finding suggests that handwriting remains a valuable learning tool, particularly for students learning new material, taking notes, and developing spelling skills. A 2024 study published in Frontiers in Psychology demonstrated these differences in brain connectivity between handwriting and typing.

A 2026 RAND study on American students found that AI use for homework increased from 48% in May 2025 to 62% in December of the same year. Students themselves expressed concerns about AI's impact on critical-thinking skills, with 67% agreeing that increased AI usage could be detrimental. Researchers argued for distinguishing between cognitive offloading (technology performing mental work) and cognitive augmentation (technology encouraging deeper thinking), proposing clear school-wide rules to guide AI usage.

The renewed interest in handwriting extends beyond academic honesty concerns, as research shows that forming letters by hand activates the brain differently than typing. UNESCO has also emphasized that technology decisions should be based on evidence, with digital tools proven effective when used for clear educational purposes and supported by teachers.

The UAE's National Education Charter emphasizes critical thinking, literacy, creativity, and AI fluency as future skills, while the Ministry of Education introduced a national AI training program for ethical and effective use. Balancing handwriting with digital tools is essential to ensure students develop both AI fluency and the ability to work independently without digital assistance.

Written by urgent.news from Gulf News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at gulfnews.com →

More in AI

A recent controversy surrounding an artificial intelligence (AI) system's grading for an English essay test has sparked concerns over fairness and accuracy in automated evaluations. The issue came to light when a student took the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) mock exam, specifically the English section, and received an unexpectedly high score for an essay response that was later found to contain several instances of specific phrases or "buzzwords" that are often favored in evaluations. The student expressed frustration upon learning that despite their teacher grading the same essay as a C, the AI system awarded it an A. This discrepancy has raised questions about the reliability of AI in assessing student performance, particularly when it appears to prioritize certain keywords over the logical coherence or overall quality of the response. Further investigation revealed that the AI system seemed to give more weight to the presence of certain "buzzwords" rather than the content or logical structure of the essay. This approach has been criticized for potentially rewarding students who are adept at identifying and incorporating favored phrases into their work, rather than those who demonstrate a deeper understanding or more nuanced expression of the subject matter. The Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE), the organization responsible for developing and grading the CSAT, has acknowledged the issue and is taking steps to address concerns over the AI grading system. KICE officials have stated that they are working to refine the AI evaluation algorithm to ensure that it assesses responses based on a more balanced and comprehensive set of criteria, rather than relying heavily on specific keywords. The incident highlights the challenges and limitations of using AI in educational assessments, particularly in evaluating subjective or creative tasks such as essay writing. As educators and policymakers continue to integrate AI into various aspects of education, ensuring the fairness, accuracy, and reliability of AI systems in grading and evaluation will be crucial. The goal is to create a system that supports and fairly assesses student learning, without inadvertently encouraging superficial strategies or disadvantaging students who approach problems differently.

More from Friday 14 August →