Urgent.News

600+ sources. One page. See who else covered it.

Editions

World

Thomas homers to back Mahle in the Braves’ 6-3 victory over the Mets

In a 6-3 triumph, the Atlanta Braves secured a win against the New York Mets on Wednesday. Tyler Mahle, a recently acquired trade deadline player, delivered a strong six innings on the mound. Lane Thomas contributed to the victory with a solo homer, marking his first since joining the Braves. The Braves capitalized on Thomas' hit with a three-run seventh inning, featuring back-to-back homers from Mike Yastrzemski and Austin Riley.

The Atlanta team also benefited from contributions from Ronald Acuña Jr., who had two hits and an RBI, and Drake Baldwin, who drove in a run with three singles. The Braves' pitching staff struggled slightly, with Mahle conceding one run on four hits and seven strikeouts, while rookie Zac Thornton allowed three runs in six innings.

Written by urgent.news from Winnipeg Free Press's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at winnipegfreepress.com →

More in World

The Seoul Central District Court has finalized the dismissal of charges against a university club member and a doctor who were indicted for administering narcotics. On the 18th, the Supreme Court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal and finalized the dismissal of charges against A, who was a member of a university club, and B, a doctor in his 50s. A and B were indicted for violating the Narcotics Control Act by administering hallucinogenic substances to club members at a university in Seoul in June 2021. The Seoul Central District Court dismissed the charges in January of this year, citing that the search and seizure of evidence was illegal. The prosecution appealed, but the high court upheld the lower court's decision, and the Supreme Court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal, finalizing the dismissal of charges. The Supreme Court stated that the search and seizure by the police was illegal and that it was difficult to acknowledge the evidence collected through it. The court also stated that even if the evidence was collected illegally, if it was inevitable and the illegality is not serious, it can be used as evidence, but in this case, it was difficult to acknowledge it as evidence because the illegality was serious. The court also mentioned that there was no need to make a specific statement on the trial court's violation of the rules of evidence. The Supreme Court finalized the decision, saying that there was no reason to overturn the original decision. The Seoul Central District Court previously dismissed the charges against nine people, including A and B, who were indicted on charges of administering narcotics, citing that the evidence collected through illegal search and seizure was illegal. The nine people, including A, were those who were administered hallucinogenic substances along with A and B. The court stated that it was difficult to acknowledge the evidence collected through illegal search and seizure as evidence, and that the charges against all nine people, including A and B, were dismissed.

More from Thursday 13 August →