Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Health & Medicine

Is It Better to Have a Lot of Casual Friends or a Few Close Ones?

Friendships are integral to human health and well being, yet researchers know very little about how people make friends. A new study investigated what people prioritize for new friendships. The post Is It Better to Have a Lot of Casual Friends or a Few Close Ones? appeared first on Nautilus .

Is It Better to Have a Lot of Casual Friends or a Few Close Ones?

A new study published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior explores the relationship between the number of friends and the depth of those friendships. Researchers found that people do not necessarily choose between having many friends or being emotionally close with them. Instead, participants expressed a desire for both broad friendship networks and emotional intimacy with their friends.

The study involved over 5,000 international participants and examined how their preferences for wide networks of friends corresponded to their actual friend count, willingness to make new friends, and overall personality traits. Those who preferred a larger social circle tended to be more extroverted, had more friends, and felt a greater sense of support from their network.

Conversely, individuals who prioritized emotional intimacy with their friends reported having fewer friends willing to help them, heightened concerns over exclusion and loneliness, and less satisfaction with their friendships. They were also more inclined to share personal information with potential new friends, indicating a strong motivation to expand their social networks.

The most intriguing finding was that people did not exhibit a simple trade-off between quantity and quality of friendships. Rather, participants generally desired both a wide friendship network and emotional closeness with their friends. This suggests that individuals may not be choosing between having a few close friends or many casual acquaintances, but rather adopting strategies that allow them to maintain both wide-ranging connections and close relationships.

The researchers speculate that this preference for both wide networks and emotional intimacy may function as an alarm system, alerting individuals when their current social arrangements are not meeting their emotional needs. This could motivate them to seek out new opportunities to form deeper connections.

Interestingly, the study found no significant difference between how men and women approached friendship-making, indicating that the universal value placed on emotional closeness transcends gender. The researchers also note that further research is needed to examine how these preferences manifest in real-world friendship dynamics, such as among college students, medical professionals, and working adults.

Additionally, the role of personality traits in shaping friendship preferences remains an intriguing area for future investigation.

Written by urgent.news from Nautilus's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at nautil.us →

More in Health & Medicine

More from Wednesday 12 August →