Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

Following Senate delay, crypto bill has a narrow window to become law

After an August recess, lawmakers in the Senate will have just 36 days in session before the end of the year to pass the CLARITY Act.

Following Senate delay, crypto bill has a narrow window to become law

As lawmakers in the Senate prepare to return from an August recess, there remains just 36 days before the year's end to pass the CLARITY Act. This Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is anticipated to be put to a cloture vote in September upon the Senate's return, but it still encounters significant obstacles on its way to becoming law.

Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture for the crypto market structure bill to be brought to the floor for consideration before the Senate's break for a month-long recess last week. Upon lawmakers' return from their recess on September 14, they have only 14 days scheduled to be in session before taking a recess before the November election and an additional 22 days before the end of the year.

Despite optimism among crypto industry advocates about the bill's chances in Congress, many lawmakers have not reached an agreement on several provisions that remain contentious. These issues include ethics language related to US President Donald Trump's connections to digital assets and further limitations for crypto companies offering stablecoin rewards.

Since being passed by the House of Representatives last year, the Senate has had 13 months to consider the CLARITY Act. During this time, the chamber has faced multiple government shutdowns, resistance from industry leaders, and criticism from numerous Democrats who argued that the bill would enable what they termed "crypto corruption" by President Trump.

Should the Senate hold a cloture vote in September, lawmakers would only have a short amount of time to address the bill's issues before a possible floor vote and breaking for the pre-election recess. After the November midterm elections, when all 435 House seats and 33 Senate seats will be contested, the composition of Congress could change, potentially complicating discussions on the legislation, with many members of Congress likely leaving in 2027.

In the absence of the market structure bill for at least a month, many experts are turning to regulatory agencies such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for clarity. The legislation was intended to grant the CFTC greater authority to regulate and enforce rules governing digital assets, but with the law still pending, these agencies have indicated they will proceed with rulemaking even if Congress fails to pass CLARITY.

In a July interview, SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that the agency is "prepared, willing, and able to issue rules" to address crypto if Congress does not pass CLARITY. Similarly, CFTC Chair Michael Selig remarked in April that the commission is "ready to assume responsibility" for overseeing crypto markets, referring to lawmakers enacting the market structure bill. Both agencies have taken measures to coordinate oversight of financial markets.

Written by urgent.news from Cointelegraph's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at cointelegraph.com →

More in Finance & Markets

Will the solidarity of the comprehensive real estate tax (CRAT) supporters expand or shrink? The political economy of the CRAT alliance The ruling Democratic Party of Korea and the main opposition United Future Party have agreed to impose a 6% surtax on those with an annual income of 40 million won or more and an asset ownership tax of over 200 million won. In addition, they have agreed to increase the number of those who are subject to the comprehensive real estate tax by lowering the current 900 million won standard for imposing the tax to 600 million won for houses and 400 million for land. The government and the National Assembly are also discussing a plan to expand the tax base by reducing the lower limit of the tax from 12 million to 9 million won for those who have a house and from 50 million to 40 million for those who do not have a house. The comprehensive real estate tax, which was introduced in 2005, has been applied only to those with a high tax base, such as those with assets of 900 million won or more. However, if the government's plan is implemented, about 1.1 million households, including those with assets of 400-600 million won, will be newly imposed. The Democratic Party of Korea and the United Future Party have been fiercely battling over the comprehensive real estate tax, which has become a major issue in the 21st National Assembly. The two parties have been engaging in a battle of wits over the comprehensive real estate tax, with the Democratic Party pushing for a stronger tax and the United Future Party advocating for a reduction in the tax. The Democratic Party has been pushing for a comprehensive real estate tax reform, including a reduction in the lower limit of the tax and an increase in the tax rate, while the United Future Party has been pushing for a reduction in the tax rate and an increase in the lower limit of the tax. The United Future Party has stated that it will not agree to a comprehensive real estate tax increase that would impose additional taxes on the middle class. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major controversy in Korean politics, with supporters arguing that it is necessary to reduce real estate speculation and opponents arguing that it unfairly targets those who have worked hard. The controversy over the comprehensive real estate tax is expected to continue, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The tax reform is expected to have a significant impact on the Korean economy and society, with some arguing that it will help to reduce real estate speculation and others arguing that it will unfairly target certain groups. The government and the National Assembly are under pressure to finalize the details of the tax reform, with some arguing that it is necessary to address the issue of real estate speculation and others arguing that it is necessary to protect the rights of taxpayers. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major issue in Korean politics, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The tax reform is expected to have a significant impact on the Korean economy and society, with some arguing that it will help to reduce real estate speculation and others arguing that it will unfairly target certain groups. The controversy over the comprehensive real estate tax is expected to continue, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The government and the National Assembly are under pressure to finalize the details of the tax reform, with some arguing that it is necessary to address the issue of real estate speculation and others arguing that it is necessary to protect the rights of taxpayers. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major controversy in Korean politics, with supporters arguing that it is necessary to reduce real estate speculation and opponents arguing that it unfairly targets those who have worked hard. The Democratic Party of Korea and the United Future Party have been fiercely battling over the comprehensive real estate tax, which has become a major issue in the 21st National Assembly. The two parties have been engaging in a battle of wits over the comprehensive real estate tax, with the Democratic Party pushing for a stronger tax and the United Future Party advocating for a reduction in the tax. The United Future Party has stated that it will not agree to a comprehensive real estate tax increase that would impose additional taxes on the middle class. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major controversy in Korean politics, with supporters arguing that it is necessary to reduce real estate speculation and opponents arguing that it unfairly targets those who have worked hard. The controversy over the comprehensive real estate tax is expected to continue, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The tax reform is expected to have a significant impact on the Korean economy and society, with some arguing that it will help to reduce real estate speculation and others arguing that it will unfairly target certain groups. The government and the National Assembly are under pressure to finalize the details of the tax reform, with some arguing that it is necessary to address the issue of real estate speculation and others arguing that it is necessary to protect the rights of taxpayers. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major issue in Korean politics, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The tax reform is expected to have a significant impact on the Korean economy and society, with some arguing that it will help to reduce real estate speculation and others arguing that it will unfairly target certain groups. The controversy over the comprehensive real estate tax is expected to continue, with the government and the National Assembly yet to finalize the details of the tax reform. The government and the National Assembly are under pressure to finalize the details of the tax reform, with some arguing that it is necessary to address the issue of real estate speculation and others arguing that it is necessary to protect the rights of taxpayers. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major controversy in Korean politics, with supporters arguing that it is necessary to reduce real estate speculation and opponents arguing that it unfairly targets those who have worked hard. The Democratic Party of Korea and the United Future Party have been fiercely battling over the comprehensive real estate tax, which has become a major issue in the 21st National Assembly. The two parties have been engaging in a battle of wits over the comprehensive real estate tax, with the Democratic Party pushing for a stronger tax and the United Future Party advocating for a reduction in the tax. The United Future Party has stated that it will not agree to a comprehensive real estate tax increase that would impose additional taxes on the middle class. The comprehensive real estate tax has been a major

More from Tuesday 11 August →