Does Sophie Cunningham benefit from white privilege? Of course she does | Etan Thomas
One of the player’s WNBA rivals said the Fever guard is treated differently from her Black peers. There’s plenty of evidence to back that statement up White privilege. An accusation that triggers multitudes of white people in America as if you had insulted their mother. Mention racism, and people may debate you. Mention discrimination, and people may even listen. But say the words “white…
The WNBA players DiJonai Carrington and Sophie Cunningham have faced different treatment based on their racial identities. Carrington, a Black player, was ejected after an incident in a game against the Fever and later posted the controversial phrase "WHITE PRIVILEGE" on social media. In contrast, Cunningham, a white player, faced no similar backlash for her own retaliatory foul in a previous game.
This disparity highlights the existence of white privilege in the WNBA, as Cunningham's actions led to increased marketability and endorsement opportunities, while Carrington faced potential criminal prosecution. The racial subtext in the media coverage of these incidents reveals a systemic issue of protection for white players and a perceived need for caution around Black players, perpetuating dangerous stereotypes.
Written by urgent.news from The Guardian US's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
