Urgent.News

the world's headlines, one feed

Editions

AI

The AI Slop Backlash Is Actually Having an Impact

Platforms are finally recognizing that people don’t want to consume AI slop. A growing number of sites and apps now have tools and policies to flag, label, and ban AI-generated content.

The AI Slop Backlash Is Actually Having an Impact

Americans are increasingly expressing their disdain for generative AI, with many wishing they could leave behind the technology and return to an analog lifestyle. A recent Gallup poll revealed that young people between the ages of 18 and 29 view generative AI as doing more harm than good, with nearly half of this demographic expressing negative sentiment towards the technology.

In response to this backlash, companies have begun directly addressing concerns. LinkedIn introduced a "seems like AI slop" button for reporting AI-generated content, while Snapchat announced that AI-generated videos would no longer be eligible for its discovery feed. Substack added an AI detection tool to monitor writers' work.

The core issue driving this backlash is the feeling that Americans never consented to the integration of AI into their daily lives. Many were unaware that their online interactions would be scraped for AI model training, and that social media platforms would incorporate AI-generated content and deepfakes without their explicit permission.

This lack of consent is particularly problematic, as tech companies have not been sensitive to the issue of consent, especially when it comes to marginalized communities who have historically been exploited and abused online. While some backlash has led to the removal of unwanted AI features, such as Google's recent rollback of its generative AI tool for tweaking satellite images on Google Earth, others have been met with public outcry.

Brand marketing efforts incorporating generative AI have faced negative reactions, with even local shops receiving pushback for using AI-generated posters to promote events. Data center protests, which have emerged across the political spectrum, reflect a growing concern about the environmental and economic damage caused by these facilities.

While individuals may feel powerless in the face of large, well-funded tech companies, the successful rollbacks of some AI features demonstrate the power of collective action and the effectiveness of public pressure.

Written by urgent.news from Wired's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — it may contain errors, so check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at wired.com →

More in AI

Only Two AI Updates Cleared My 36-Hour Cutoff

I checked eleven AI and agent candidates today. Only two cleared a strict 36-hour cutoff. The first is Meta Muse Glimmer, a roughly 30B multimodal model released under Apache 2.0 and aimed at agentic…

  • Only two AI models passed 36-hour cutoff.
  • Meta Muse Glimmer and Transformers 5.15.0 cleared.
  • Both models have specific technical details.