Rackspace beats expectations but its losses pile up amid aggressive AI pivot
Shares of Rackspace Technology Inc. were trading lower after-hours today, despite an encouraging earnings and revenue beat in its second-quarter financial results. The San Antonio-based company reported earnings before certain costs such as stock compensation of eight cents per share, just ahead of Wall Street’s target of nine cents per share. Revenue for the period […] The post Rackspace beats…
Rackspace Technology reported stronger-than-expected earnings and revenue in its second quarter, but the San Antonio-based company is grappling with mounting losses as it aggressively pivots towards artificial intelligence. The company's shares dipped following the earnings release, despite meeting Wall Street's earnings per share target.
Rackspace's revenue for the period stood at $670.1 million, only slightly up from the previous year. However, Wall Street had anticipated a decline in revenue, with analysts predicting $646 million. The company acknowledged a net loss of $67.5 million for the quarter, compared to a loss of $55 million in the prior year. CEO Gajen Kandiah expressed optimism about the burgeoning AI business, noting the increasing adoption of AI in regulated industries.
However, Rackspace's strategic pivot towards managed enterprise AI infrastructure has not been without challenges. It has led to significant layoffs and hefty operating costs. The company is currently embroiled in a federal securities fraud lawsuit, alleging that it misled investors about the costs associated with its AI business.
This lawsuit has resulted in a 34% drop in the company's value on a single day. In response, Rackspace revised its full-year guidance, projecting a loss between 25 and 30 cents per share on revenue between $2.45 billion and $2.55 billion. Analysts, however, are expecting a narrower loss of 18 cents per share on sales of $2.5 billion.
Written by urgent.news from SiliconANGLE's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — it may contain errors, so check the original before relying on it.