What makes Trump's ballroom a matter of national security?
Despite a ruling blocking construction of his proposed $400 million ballroom, President Donald Trump remains adamant the project must be built for the nation's security.
A federal appeals court recently blocked the construction of a $400 million ballroom proposed by President Donald Trump, citing concerns over the project's impact on national security and the Constitution. Despite this ruling, Trump remains undeterred, stating that the complex is being built for the protection of the country and promising to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The judges who blocked the project criticized the administration's national security argument and emphasized that the president does not have the authority to make major alterations to the White House without congressional approval. The president's plan includes various security features, such as bomb shelters, state-of-the-art medical facilities, protective missile-resistant structures, and bulletproof glass.
While underground work on security-related features can continue, the main construction of the ballroom is being halted. The decision is expected to be overturned by the Supreme Court, but the current ruling allows for the construction of below-ground facilities necessary for presidential security and protection of the White House.
Written by urgent.news from ABC News (US)'s reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Taylor Swift songs removed from Trump and White House’s social media posts theguardian.com
- Taylor Swift songs removed from White House social media videos dailytimes.com.pk
- Pregnant woman in hiding as White House ends deportation protections for Haitian migrants cbsnews.com
- Taylor Swift's songs deleted from White House, Trump campaign social media posts cbc.ca
- Trump signs executive orders to restrict birthright citizenship despite Supreme Court’s adverse decision english.elpais.com
- With broad bipartisan support, Congress is about to give Trump ‘unchecked authority’ to impose new tariffs of up to 100% on top trading partners fortune.com
- The question raised inside the White House that could define America's future - opinion jpost.com
- Senate votes to block rule giving White House more control over research science.org