Senate panel holds Fauci in contempt over refusal to answer COVID-19 questions
A Senate panel voted Thursday to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt for repeatedly declining to answer questions last week from lawmakers investigating the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. Why it matters: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has said he will refer the contempt resolution to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution. That could set up a legal clash, since former President Biden…
On Thursday, the Senate Homeland Security Committee voted 8-5 to charge Dr. Anthony Fauci with contempt for his repeated refusal to answer questions from lawmakers during a probe into the COVID-19 pandemic's origins. The contentious issue centers around Sen. Rand Paul's intention to refer the contempt resolution to the Department of Justice for potential prosecution.
This move presents a legal challenge, as former President Biden had already pardoned Fauci before leaving office. The Senate panel's decision is part of a broader Republican effort to intensify scrutiny on Fauci. Sen. Ron Johnson revealed that a subcommittee has obtained Fauci's phone records, potentially leading to further disclosures.
Paul argued that Fauci had no reason to invoke his Fifth Amendment right during the hearing, given Biden's pre-pardom, asserting that Fauci should have simply "told the truth." Democrats, however, contend that Republicans are attempting to put Fauci in legal jeopardy, potentially discouraging future testimony. Sen. Gary Peters warned that the vote may hinder future oversight efforts, as witnesses could cite this decision as a justification for refusing to participate.
At the committee's earlier hearing, Fauci accused Paul of having an "unhinged obsession" and attempting to force him to make statements that could advance a narrative of prison time. Republicans accused him of evading inquiries regarding studies funded in China and the "gain of function" research, which they have used to argue that the pandemic stemmed from a lab leak.
The inquiry's potential political impact is a subject of interest, with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon suggesting it might energize the Republican base through the perception that government scientists remain under the influence of pharmaceutical and other special interests. The fallout from Fauci's situation could potentially deter scientists from public service roles.
Written by urgent.news from Axios's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
