Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Senate committee set to vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress

Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security Committee want to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer their questions about the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Senate committee set to vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress

On Thursday, a Senate committee voted to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress and refer him to the Justice Department for potential prosecution. This decision came a week after Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination over 100 times during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing focused on his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sen. Rand Paul, MD (R-Ky.), the committee chairman, has stated that constitutional protection did not apply to Fauci as he had received a pardon from Democratic President Joe Biden the previous year, eliminating any threat of prosecution. Fauci and Democrats opposed to the contempt resolution argued that Fauci had a legitimate fear of self-incrimination due to Republicans' desire to seek his prosecution.

Paul emphasized that the vote was not about Fauci's policies or previous statements, but whether a witness with the benefits of a pardon could be ordered to answer questions and then defy this order without consequence. Fauci explained in a statement that he feared criminal charges given Paul's determination to get him to say anything that could vindicate his public promises to "end up, in his words, behind bars."

The referral is sent to the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, which will decide whether to investigate or prosecute Fauci for contempt. Paul acknowledged that contempt resolutions usually go through the full Senate but wanted to avoid wasting time on this route as the resolution was unlikely to get the required 60 votes to advance.

Regardless of the outcome, this episode raises questions about lawmakers' ability to compel testimony from previously pardoned witnesses, potentially impacting other high-profile cases where clemency may be granted before the White House exit.

Written by urgent.news from MedPage Today's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at npr.org →

More in World

More from Thursday 6 August →