Urgent.News

600+ sources. One page. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

Sam Altman’s OpenAI publishes brutal critique of Apple lawsuit: ‘Apple is getting this wrong’

Everything you need to know before you reach the office this morning.

Sam Altman’s OpenAI publishes brutal critique of Apple lawsuit: ‘Apple is getting this wrong’

OpenAI has responded to a lawsuit filed by Apple, accusing the tech giant of making mistakes in its claims. According to OpenAI, Apple's outside counsel emailed the wrong person after confusing two Asian last names. OpenAI has shared emails and messages that it claims show Apple got some of its facts wrong.

Apple's lawsuit, filed in July, accused OpenAI of stealing trade secrets using a "coordinated pattern of misconduct at an institutional level." Apple alleged that a former employee who joined OpenAI exploited an authentication bug and that OpenAI leadership "normalized" such conduct. OpenAI denied wrongdoing and said it was not interested in Apple's trade secrets.

In a blog post, OpenAI called Apple's lawsuit "careless, aggressive and oddly personal." The company released redacted iMessages showing Apple staff asking a former employee for files, which OpenAI referred to as "residual access." OpenAI also accused Apple's lawyers of a February email mix-up. According to the Times of India, OpenAI's public letter stated, "Apple is getting this wrong."

Brief written by urgent.news from Fortune, Business Insider, Digital Trends, Economic Times Tech, Times of India — 5 reports on this story. Machine-written — it may contain errors, so check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

I Gave DeepSeek a Token Limit. It Ignored Me.

A hands-on test of V4-Pro's default reasoning mode ⚠️ This article was generated with AI assistance (Claude). Every number comes from real calls the author made to DeepSeek's official API on the day…

  • DeepSeek's V4-Pro model reasons automatically without specific parameters.
  • Maxcompletiontokens parameter set to 3072 had no effect.
  • API accepted hidden parameters, making limit effects undetectable until billed.