OpenAI: “Apple is getting this wrong” ↦
From an un-bylined post on OpenAI’s site: Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction is both based on false information and completely unnecessary because we do not have, nor want, any of their trade secrets. …
OpenAI has commented on Apple's request for a preliminary injunction, dismissing it as "both based on false information and completely unnecessary." The company's stance is clear: they have no interest in Apple's trade secrets and are more focused on creating innovative products and technologies. OpenAI has provided numerous transcripts of messages and emails that they claim support their case, but OpenAI asserts that their efforts are purely focused on staying ahead of the curve in the technology landscape.
Jess Wetherbed from The Verge suggests this is a publicity stunt, as if OpenAI were to present concrete evidence, the appropriate response would be to move to court. Throughout the article, the writer cannot help but recall a legal adage: "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law.
If you have neither on your side, pound the table." The screenshots cited in Apple's request appear to be either third-party apps mimicking Messages or a precise recreation of conversations in a Messages-like format, which the writer suspects is the latter.
Written by urgent.news from Six Colors's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
