How the Ted Lasso Trap Keeps Women on the Sideline
Hollywood knows audiences will watch women, so why does it still introduce them through the safety of male-led hits?
The fourth season of Ted Lasso is set to premiere on August 5, featuring the show's signature teddy bear of a coach, now tasked with leading a second-division women's soccer team. This move appears progressive, yet it highlights Hollywood's hesitance in putting women at the forefront of their narratives. Female characters often find themselves within established franchises or recognizable intellectual properties, a strategic move to minimize any commercial risk.
When these projects succeed, credit is often attributed to the established brand. However, when they fail, the narrative reverts to questioning women's ability to captivate audiences.
This cycle is reinforced by data indicating that female-led films, on average, generate higher worldwide box-office revenue than their male-led counterparts, across various budget categories. Despite these findings, studios continue to rely on franchises and established properties when producing female-led content. The risk management strategy involves tying female-led projects to successful franchises, thereby mitigating financial uncertainty.
This approach is evident in projects like Ocean's 8, Ghostbusters, and Black Widow, where female characters are integrated into well-established male-led narratives.
The pattern suggests that women are only given the chance to lead stories after men have established the commercial viability of the property. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle where studios cautiously approach female-led entertainment, relying on familiar properties and promoting the results as cultural phenomena. The outcome is a project that must not only entertain but also prove that women are commercially viable.
In this environment, Ted Lasso may be perceived as a safety net, rather than a groundbreaking step forward for women in entertainment.
Written by urgent.news from Newsweek's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.