Is the recycling symbol free speech? A judge just ruled it could be.
The ruling pauses California's effort to limit the recycling symbol to products that are actually recycled, setting up a new First Amendment fight over environmental marketing.
A federal judge has ruled that a California law limiting the use of the recycling symbol may violate the First Amendment. Judge William Hayes issued a preliminary injunction, blocking the enforcement of SB 343, which passed in 2021. The law aimed to restrict the use of the familiar "chasing arrows" symbol on products not widely accepted and sorted for recycling in California.
The judge found that key provisions of the law were "unconstitutionally vague" and likely infringed on protected commercial speech. Supporters of the legislation argue that it is necessary to combat consumer fraud and reduce confusion in recycling practices. However, the judge sided with industry trade groups, arguing that the law would prevent companies from providing truthful information about their products.
The decision is a setback for environmental advocates who hoped to clear up the recycling symbol's meaning and reduce plastic pollution in the state.
Written by urgent.news from Grist's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
