Urgent.News

600+ sources. One page. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

Congress needs an AI framework now

The United States needs a federal AI framework for one simple reason: Nobody knows where the lines are drawn.

Congress needs an AI framework now

The United States is rapidly approaching a critical juncture in the development and regulation of artificial intelligence (AI). With both the Trump administration and members of Congress actively pushing for a federal framework to govern this rapidly evolving technology, the need for clear, comprehensive guidelines has never been more urgent. However, a politically divisive issue – federal preemption of state AI laws – threatens to derail these much-needed legislative efforts.

The administration has taken significant steps in promoting AI innovation and security through executive orders and the upcoming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Meanwhile, Congress is stepping up with bipartisan proposals such as the FRONTIER Act, which would establish a federal framework for frontier AI governance, and the AI Risk Evaluation Act, which would require AI developers to submit their most advanced models for testing and risk assessment before deployment.

These proposals demonstrate Congress's capability to debate and enact meaningful AI governance measures.

Despite the progress, a significant obstacle remains in the form of the preemption debate. Some argue that a federal regulatory ceiling is necessary to prevent a patchwork of state laws, but this concern is based on a flawed assumption. In reality, states such as California, New York, and Illinois have taken action to create governance structures that function as de facto national standards. These states are more likely to set a national standard than to create a fragmented 50-state regulatory system.

Moreover, public opinion is shifting in favor of action. Over 250 state lawmakers have recently opposed federal efforts to override state AI laws, emphasizing the need for meaningful federal protections alongside state authority. The White House and certain congressional allies have recognized this resistance and have continued exploring proposals that balance preemption with broader AI governance measures.

In light of the urgent need for a federal AI framework, it is time for Congress to focus on establishing clear oversight and legal obligations for AI developers, while preserving the ability of states to address specific issues. A federal framework is not only necessary to guide development and protect consumers but also to provide the statutory clarity required in this rapidly changing landscape. The moment is here to act, and the time for action is now.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — it may contain errors, so check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

Ranked: How Dirty Are the Eight Biggest Names in AI

Big Tech companies are quietly moving farther and farther away from their decarbonization goals. Back in 2019, Amazon pledged to become carbon neutral by 2040, thereby setting a goalpost ten years…

  • Amazon constructing largest gas-fired power plant in Texas
  • Elon Musk's xAI is the dirtiest AI firm with CO2 score of 6
  • Cleanest AI firms' projects still emit as much CO2 as a third of France annually