Closed court, no jury: a legal expert explains what’s happening with Alan Jones’ trial

The trial of former radio personality and Wallabies coach Alan Jones commenced in a closed court setting. Six male complainants are set to testify regarding alleged indecent assaults and sexual touching that occurred between 2003 and 2020 at Jones' Sydney apartment and another property in the Southern Highlands. This case includes 22 charges in total, with 20 counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching.

The courtroom is exclusively accessible to Judge Glenn Walsh, legal representatives, media representatives, and child protection officials due to its limited capacity. Jones has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

Jones opted for a judge-alone trial instead of a jury trial, a decision that can be attributed to perceptions of potential jury bias or overwhelming social media coverage. This type of trial is common, accounting for up to 18% of serious criminal cases in New South Wales. Judge Walsh will be responsible for making factual findings and reaching a verdict, unlike a jury trial where the jury makes those determinations.

The prosecution, led by Georgina Wright, aims to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegations are true, arguing that Jones either knew he did not have consent or acted recklessly indifferent to consent. The defense, represented by Gabrielle Bashir, asserts that there are no direct witnesses beyond the complainants and the accused, arguing the alleged events did not occur and were fabricated by the complainants.

They may also argue consent as a defense, allowing Jones to testify he honestly believed the complainants consented. The trial is anticipated to involve over 70 witnesses and could last several weeks.