Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

‘All she did was change the face’: I spoke to a creator whose video was stolen and 'reskinned' with AI

When an AI clone hijacked creator Paige Davis's likeness, her fight to take it down exposed Big Tech's systemic failure to protect everyday users.

‘All she did was change the face’: I spoke to a creator whose video was stolen and 'reskinned' with AI

A creator, Paige Davis, discovered her identity had been hijacked and used in an AI-generated video without her consent. The video replicated her voice, body language, outfit, and background, only altering her face. This phenomenon, dubbed "digital body-snatching," is gaining traction on the internet, where AI tools allow users to replicate another person's physical presence.

Paige, along with her followers, reported the stolen clip, but the platform's moderation system denied all reports. Despite her efforts, the video resurfaced multiple times.

The economic incentives behind these AI reskin videos are straightforward - leveraging authentic human charisma to build trust, then cloning it for clicks, affiliate payouts, or engagement inflation. Tools such as SyncLabs and Wav2Lip enable this process by taking stolen audio and overlaying it onto targeted video, syncing mouth movements frame by frame.

Tech giants like Meta appear to prioritize default opt-ins that treat user identities as raw material. Paige questions the rationale behind this approach. Similar to Apple's unrequested U2 album on iPods, this practice raises concerns about the ownership of personal assets on these platforms.

Furthermore, legal attempts to establish safeguards against unauthorized deepfakes are met with resistance from AI companies. xAI, for instance, has sued to nullify state bans on unauthorized deepfakes, arguing that platform liability infringes on free speech. This strategy places the onus of defense on victims, while AI companies claim immunity from repercussions.

Beyond the creator economy, everyday internet users also face threats from this AI technology. As creators rely on these platforms for their livelihood, the lack of protective measures leaves them vulnerable. Paige emphasizes the need for accountability and the preservation of truth in the face of these digital skin-walkers.

Written by urgent.news from Tom's Guide's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at tomsguide.com →

More in AI

July 2026 newsletter

The June edition of my sponsors-only monthly newsletter is out. If you are a sponsor (or if you start a sponsorship now) you can access it here .

Turn Chatbot Misunderstandings Into Grammar Regression Tests

A custom-grammar bot can be reliable right up until someone types a perfectly reasonable sentence that the grammar author did not anticipate.

  • Separate command parsing from domain validation.
  • Implement time validation function for feeding times.
  • Use failed conversations to improve grammar.

Voice Commander: Control Your Mac with Hey Jarvis

The Problem With Cloud AI Every token costs money. Every API call adds up. And your data goes to their servers. The Local Alternative brew install ollama ollama pull llama3.2 ollama serve Now you have…

More from Sunday 2 August →