Urgent.News

600+ sources. One page. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

AI slop pollutes the CVE pipeline with fake vulns

With NIST still buried under its backlog, expect AI-generated bogus reports to continue

AI slop pollutes the CVE pipeline with fake vulns

AI-generated vulnerabilities have infiltrated the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) pipeline, according to security researchers. Fake critical- and high-rated CVEs for SQLite, a popular open-source database, recently appeared in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) with assistance from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

These bogus advisories claimed to uncover severe security flaws in SQLite, but were later determined to be entirely fabricated. JFrog, a software supply chain security firm, discovered six SQLite advisories published by an obscure GitHub repository, which all failed to describe a reproducible vulnerability. Moreover, the accompanying proof-of-concept tests revealed no memory leaks or errors, debunking the claimed use-after-free (UAF) vulnerability.

Similar fraudulent CVEs were found in the GitHub repository, targeting other open-source software like libraw and ESP32-audioI2S. The issue stems from a lack of mandatory checkpoints in the CVE pipeline, where every claimed vulnerability should be independently verified. As a result, AI-generated advisories can easily bypass security measures and enter widely used databases, wasting time and resources for security professionals.

JFrog recommended several checks before acting on a newly published CVE, including verifying the vendor's credibility, the absence of commit hashes or pull requests in the reference fields, and suspicious metadata. These 54 apparently bogus CVEs are merely one example of a growing problem anticipated to be more prevalent as AI-generated advisories become increasingly effortless to produce.

Written by urgent.news from The Register's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — it may contain errors, so check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at theregister.com →

More in AI

Why GPT-5.6 Luna High Is My Default for Agentic Engineering

I used to pick coding models the same way people pick sports cars: choose the most powerful one and pretend the fuel bill is somebody else's problem.

  • GPT-5.6 Luna favored for agentic engineering tasks
  • Low input ($0.20) and output ($1.20) token costs
  • High reasoning effort ensures effectiveness

Using RLM Cut's Token Costs by 96% for LLM

As someone who is constantly exploring ways to make AI applications faster and cheaper, I found myself looking for a solution to a problem that kept slowing me down: processing 100,000+ token context…

  • Developer rewrote RLM code in Rust, achieving 37.6% faster execution
  • RLM-Rust implementation reduced token costs by 96.1% for 120,000 tokens
  • Rust-based solution enables efficient processing of large context windows